News

Reports landowners have been informed of Transgrid’s preferred HumeLink route

Max O'Driscoll31 March 2022
Transmission tower

Landowners are reportedly in the process of being informed by Transgrid that the Tumut North route is the preferred route for HumeLink. Photo: Transgrid.

Online reports from impacted landowners suggest Transgrid has its sights set on the Tumut North route for its HumeLink project.

The reports follow the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) plan for 2022, which revealed the total project cost had swelled from $1.3 billion to $3.5 billion in two years.

An impacted resident revealed the news in a post on the HumeLink Action Facebook group.

“Those of us who have property along the so-called ‘Tumut North Route’ have not had a good day today. We were phoned by Transgrid to inform us that this was their preferred route for HumeLink,” read the post.

The post’s author detailed a collective feeling of deflation and frustration but urged others to continue to resist providing Transgrid with consent to enter their property.

Transgrid could not confirm the reports but said they had begun speaking with landowners throughout the week to discuss the refined 200-m corridor and route options.

“A thorough and respectful engagement is our absolute priority and we will complete this process before sharing the detailed information to a broader audience,” a Transgrid spokesperson said.

“We know landowners and the communities in the HumeLink study corridor want and deserve clarity on the potential impact of the project on their properties.

“This week, our community engagement team began communicating with 470 landowners from Bannaby to Yass and Tumut and from Wagga Wagga area, to advise them whether they are excluded or included in the preferred study corridor.”


READ ALSO: Communities ‘bear brunt’ of climate disasters, councillors across Australia call for federal action


The spokesperson also revealed that the company expects to confirm the preferred 200-m corridor by the end of April. The feasibility study for the project’s undergrounding is expected in a similar timeframe.

Assuming the Tumut North route has been selected, Tumut landowner Lee Kingma’s property would no longer be along the HumeLink route – news he received with mixed emotions.

“From a personal perspective, it’s great because I’m not on the route anymore, but obviously, it’s still going to affect other people, so I’m certainly not going to be gloating about it,” Mr Kingma said.

map

A map of potential routes for Transgrid’s HumeLink project. Image: Supplied.

Transgrid were deciding between the Blowering, Tumut and Tumut North options (pictured above). Mr Kingma argued that the route would impact amenity across the region, with transmission tower heights expected to range from 50 to 70 m.

He remains hopeful that Transgrid will do more to compensate not just the landowners but the wider community for the impacts.


READ ALSO: Gundagai’s Criterion Hotel sells for more than $6 million


“There needs to be a broader discussion around the compensation because people with wind farms get much more compensation than those with transmission towers, by a factor of around five or ten times more,” Mr Kingma said.

“With the wind farms, they compensate the entire community, so they have a community fund that is quite a significant amount of money that is given to the community to be spent on community projects.

“They’ve established practices that work in the wind farm industry and they share the benefits with the landowners who host the turbines and also the people who neighbour the turbines who might be impacted by its operations and maintenance.”

What's Your Opinion?

One Response to Reports landowners have been informed of Transgrid’s preferred HumeLink route

Filter
Order
Russell Erwin Russell Erwin 3:32 pm 31 Mar 22

This announcement mocks, no, it drips with contempt for, the process of consultation TransGrid say they engage in with the community and affected landholders. This they announce while other, less invasive, options (such as undergrounding) are meant to be studied. Everything they do smacks of complete disregard of genuine consultation. In their minds their plan is the only one. Anything other is to be “managed” by their spin wizards to massage a general public which has little idea of the appalling travesty about to be constructed over it. Permanently.

Top