1 September 2023

'Cheap and nasty': Community disappointment as committee rejects taking HumeLink underground

| Chris Roe
Join the conversation
power lines and Dr Joe McGirr montage

Independent Member for Wagga Wagga Dr Joe McGirr said the community had been ignored. Photo: Transgrid and Chris Roe.

Opponents of TransGrid’s multi-billion-dollar renewable electricity line across southern NSW have expressed their frustration after a new government report gave the thumbs up to overhead wires.

“This entire exercise was pre-determined and a complete sham,” declared farmer and community advocate Michael Katz.

“It was window dressing to hide what has become a process dictated by politics.”

READ ALSO New NSW inquiry to probe aerial wild horse shooting proposal, count methodology

The report by the Legislative Council Standing Committee on State Development examined the feasibility of taking transmission lines underground after fierce opposition from landholders.

Despite concerns over the potential damage to private property, farming and fire risks, the study concluded that HumeLink should proceed as an overhead transmission line project.

“In considering all the evidence, the current plan for constructing HumeLink as a 500 kV overhead transmission line is the correct approach, especially given the applicable regulatory environment and the lack of any action to date in progressing the undergrounding option,” the finding reads.

The report also delivered two recommendations. The first called for “a comprehensive cumulative impact study …before any renewable energy zone (REZ) is declared” and “community consultation on any proposed REZ to start at the scoping stage to allow adequate consideration of viable alternatives”.

The second would see the “creation of an independent ombudsman to oversee consultation and rollout …and to receive and handle complaints about these processes”.

overhead powerlines

Opponents of the HumeLink overhead lines claim the technology is outdated and dangerous. Photo: Supplied.

Independent Member for Wagga Wagga Dr Joe McGirr originally called for the feasibility study and expressed his disappointment in the decision that he said “lays the ground for more than 10,000 km of transmission lines to scar rural NSW by being installed above ground”.

He said that the community had been ignored and that this would lead to “a rushed job”.

“NSW is poised to adopt cheap and nasty electricity transmission infrastructure that is out of date, dangerous and has no social license,” he said.

“I believe that the current state government has inherited a blind-by-design regulatory framework that fails to serve the interests of communities.

“Governments have outsourced their decision-making to backroom bureaucrats and private corporations where the only thing that really matters is the bottom line.”

READ ALSO Trade expo earns top marks for helping high school students navigate career pathways

In a statement, Transgrid said that the company “remains steadfastly committed to engagement with communities and landowners who are impacted by critical transmission projects” and that they “will continue to work with them, the regulatory authorities and government representatives to collectively find solutions to balance the local impacts, consumer costs, time constraints and concerns regarding supply reliability”.

They went on to highlight the urgency required to complete the project to “secure the grid … and keep the lights on, as ageing coal generation retires”.

It was a sentiment echoed by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) which today warned that the transition to renewables was not happening quickly enough to avoid “reliability gaps”.

This week, Transgrid also released a 900-page environmental impact statement (EIS) and project director Jeremy Roberts encouraged the community to take a look and provide feedback.

“The EIS is a major step in the planning process for this critical transmission project and it gives people more opportunity to respond on significant issues such as biodiversity, bushfire risk and visual amenity,” he said.

“I encourage all stakeholders to provide their submissions to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment.”

Transgrid will also hold face-to-face community sessions from next week.

READ ALSO Magpies are evil, rotten, malevolent, dead-eyed bastards. Fact check: true

Mr Katz questioned the timing of the EIS release and suggested that Transgrid had jumped the gun by moving forward with overhead lines.

“The EIS was conveniently lodged yesterday,” he fumed.

“Clearly, they knew the outcome before it was announced, which is a disgrace.

“It is a slap in the face for the hard-working and caring people of these communities who tried in good faith to offer workable alternative solutions, which were met with disdain.”

Mr Katz declared the battle to be “far from over”.

“One day, they might catch up with the thinking of technology-savvy countries like Germany, which now has undergrounding as the default option for new transmission lines,” he said.

You can read the full report here. The HumeLink EIS will remain on exhibition until Wednesday, 27 September; you can read it here.

Original Article published by Chris Roe on Region Riverina.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

I think that Michael Katz is probably right. I’m not into conspiracy theories, except ones that are true of course. All these things are pre-determined, just think of Yes Minister. You only have an inquiry when you already know the answer. And again, why do you have an EIS? It gives you permission to wreck the environment. And why do you have community consultation? It’s a means to give the impression you care about what the community say, but when the decisions are actually for the benefit of the community and there is a sizeable cost, they will be ignored as the community has no power.

Australia is going to hell because the governments of our country are hopeless and beholden to big business. The current Labor Governments all through Australia should be following their party roots, but don’t. They side with big business as their default option. We are going backwards at a great rate of knots and we stand no chance in the era of global boiling where we need to make Australian lives better.

TransGrid is an majority foreign owned entity, and like all energy in Australia, we will give away any profits as quickly as we can. TransGrid will always make a decision for what’s best for their bottom line.

Governments never hold enquiries unless they know the result in advance. In this as in many others, the ‘fix was in’ fromm the start. Don’t expect much from the ombudsman either. It’s there to ‘handle’ complaints.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.