12 November 2021

Tuckerman joins the fight to stop the Tarago incinerator project, now attention shifts to Angus Taylor

| Max O'Driscoll
Join the conversation
Communities Against The Tarago Incinerator Inc group

Member for Goulburn Wendy Tuckerman (pictured centre) and Goulburn Mulwaree Mayor Bob Kirk (to her right) pictured with the Communities Against The Tarago Incinerator Inc group. Photo: Facebook.

Opposition to the proposed waste-to-energy facility at Tarago received a powerful showing of support late on Tuesday night (9 November), when Member for Goulburn Wendy Tuckerman voiced opposition to her Government’s proposal during a speech in Parliament.

The $600 million Advanced Energy Recovery Centre will be operated by Veolia, which already operates the nearby Woodlawn Bioreactor. The two projects would be the centrepiece of Veolia’s 6000-hectare “Woodlawn Eco Precinct” site.

Ms Tuckerman said that it was comments made in the NSW Chief Scientist’s report that confirmed her opposition to the project, particularly regarding the need for avoiding close proximity to food production, with the precinct surrounded by “fertile agricultural land, producing grain and livestock”.

“I stand with you in objecting to this waste-to-energy project,” she said.

“I will never support any project that cannot guarantee the health and safety of my community or the environment.”

In recent times, the Goulburn Mulwaree and Yass Valley Council’s have spoken against the project, both concerned with Veolia’s historical failings to correct odour issues with their facility over the last decade.

READ MORE Goulburn Mulwaree Council joins fight to stop Tarago incinerator project

“It is no secret that the current waste facility at Veolia Tarago has had an odour issue, causing much stress and anxiety for neighbouring residents,” said Ms Tuckerman.

“Based on the many odour complaints from my office and the non-compliance, I can understand the community’s hesitancy in supporting Veolia on this project, particularly when the monitoring and compliance if approved, will be crucial to ensure the health and wellbeing of the community and environment,” she said.

Ms Tuckerman explained that with the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARS) already issued, they cannot be legally withdrawn as the project is in a permissible area. However, she assured the community of a “robust planning process” that must be satisfied before the development of the facility could commence.

“To the community of Tarago, I want to reassure you that I’m hearing your concerns loud and clear and I will be with you throughout this process,” said Ms Tuckerman.

“The community are asking a lot of questions that I am also seeking answers to.”

“I want to assure the Tarago community that although the policy update identifies the Veolia Precinct as a permissible zone, there is still significant planning framework that must be satisfied,” she said.

READ ALSO Work begins on Crookwell District Hospital makeover

Spokesperson for the Communities Against the Tarago Incinerator Inc, Paige Davis said Ms Tuckerman had been “backed into a corner” after months of pestering from the community. She commented on the 11:48 pm start time of Ms Tuckerman’s speech and wondered if that time had been selected strategically.

“The fact is, she did it. Small baby steps,” said Ms Davis.

“We are pleased that she did it, it is a step in the right direction. Now we look forward to Wendy Tuckerman enthusiastically speaking to senior members of her party on our behalf, to have this project stopped,” she said.

For the group, attention now shifts to getting a response from their Federal Member for Hume, Angus Taylor. Ms Davis said it was time Mr Taylor supported his community despite acknowledging the project is not coming from a federal level.

“He’s passed the buck consistently when anyone has written to him and he’s refused to meet with any local members of the community,” she said.

“He is our elected official – one would suggest he is meant to act for us. We are yet to see that.”

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

Dear Editor

The entire sorry saga is a disgraceful reflection on the inertia shown by the LNP – at all three levels of government in the area – to advance waste sorting and reuse in the contemprary setting.

Waste sorting in other parts of the world – the Japanese town of Kamikatsu is an early stand out – sort with employees, volunteers and residents; waste into 45 different categories.

This may seem extraordinary but when you think about it, discarded clothing alone would probably cover about five: leather, wool, cotton, cotton synthetic blends and some of the more excentric such as latex & rubber.

The current crop of leaders need a good kick in the backside over the miserable attempts so far to integrate waste to product in Australia and this incinerator proposal is a dumber than dumb, retrograde idea.

The backyard incinerator has been banned for decades and yet here we have a State government attempting to incinerate the bulk of the most populous States gross mass of municiplal waste in our backyard.

Informed comentary from other stakeholders critical of this type of proposal have advanced evidence that it is not possible, by combusting, to safely break down a great many chemical compounds and airborne pollutants are a natural result.

There are no words in the English language that can adequately describe dissapointment felt with these developments.

Here we have safe Council, State and Federal members doing no more than waving placards or hiding behind busy schedules, when the deepest and most dire concerns of constituents – chemical poisoning – is about to be ridden roughshod over.

What is probably needed now is more community action.

chris whitworth9:07 pm 06 May 22

You state Japan recycling yet don’t mention that in 2019 Japan has some 380 waste-to-energy plants, accounting for more than 30% of the country’s refuse incineration facilities. and the fact that in Japan The total number of incinerators is decreasing due to the use of intensive incinerators and waste reduction and is currently at about 1,100. The most popular incinerator is a stoker type in Japan. THE issue here is Greenies don’t want Nuclear, Greenies don’t want Coal, Greenies want wind and solar which are visual pollutants and also most are non recyclable, greenies don’t want Rubbish yet today Greenies have bigger Garbage bins than they had in the 1960-1970s the issue here is the same as Greenie POLITITIANS Like ZARLI STEGGLE AND BOB BROWN HAVE WITH WIND TURBINES! NIMBY! Not In My Back Yard I find it amazing that the fact that every one Complains and put negatives on all issues yet never state the positives so people can make a proper Choice on the Facts, This is a Fine example of that every thing you look at is Greenies and negatives, as in Japan withy over 380 of these units in Europe today The EU’s current WtE incineration and co-incineration capacity is 101 million tonnes. There are currently at least 90 incinerators in the UK and 50 more proposed or in development there are 4 of these units in WA, where do you think all medical waste goes in Australia? fact is People dont want waste to be in Land fill either so why are there no suggestion’s of Alternative waste reductions and disposal? not All waste can be recycled!

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.