7 February 2022

Bungendore High School plans in disarray as Queanbeyan Council backflips on site

| Max O'Driscoll
Join the conversation
Bungendore High School

Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional councillors have voted to overturn their support of the proposed Bungendore High School site. Photo: NSW Department of Education.

Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional councillors have backflipped on a previous decision to support the proposed Bungendore High School site.

In a move described by NSW Education Minister Sarah Mitchell as unprecedented, the incoming council voted to overturn its in-principle support for the controversial Bungendore Park site.

The site was championed by former NSW Deputy Premier and Member for Monaro John Barilaro but has been strongly criticised by local group ‘Save Bungendore Park’. Its members argue the community has been split in half by the decision to use the park.

The recent council decision has further disillusioned many Bungendore residents, who fear it will lead to further delays in constructing the much-needed school expected to cater for up to 500 students.

Councillors voted six-to-one at the 27 January council meeting in favour of relinquishing support for the current site. Three councillors abstained on the night, and there was one absence.

Of the six councillors to vote in favour of overturning the previous decision, three ran on the Labor Party ticket, one on the Greens, and two were independents including new mayor Kenrich Winchester.

The only councillor to vote against the motion was Mareeta Grundy, who urged her fellow councillors to rethink their decision to help prevent another generation of Bungendore children from growing up without a local high school.

“I want Bungendore to have a high school. If we don’t go with this current proposal, we will not get a high school in the foreseeable future,” Cr Grundy said.

“We will be taking things back to square one with the Department of Education. They’ll have to find the funding again, and that takes years of discussion, assessments and planning. That could take up to five years alone.

“That in my mind is not in the interest and greater good of the community.”

READ ALSO Goulburn’s loss could be Canberra’s gain as Wakefield Park dispute drags on

Cr Grundy remained unconvinced by the prospect of an alternate site and worried the decision jeopardised years of work to bring the school to fruition.

“We don’t know when or if that funding will ever come back if this current proposal is quashed,” she said.

“All the funding with the Department of Education is around the current proposal. They can’t just wrap that money up and put it aside and reapply it to a possible, alternate proposal.

“At least another, possibly two if not three generations of Bungendore kids will miss out.”

The Bungendore High School Action Group revealed its devastation with the result, arguing it was not “based on any consultation with the wider community”.

Cr Grundy said whichever side residents were on, local children and their education had the most to lose in this argument.

“Unless you have walked in the shoes of families who have gone through six years of their child’s education and watched them get on buses as early as 6:45 in the morning and not get back as late as 5:15 in the evening… then you don’t understand what’s at jeopardy.”

One of the decision’s supporters, Councillor John Preston, said the complexity of the issues surrounding the site made a Term 1, 2023 start “all but impossible”.

“The issues covered in this [business] paper are only some of the issues yet to be tackled to deliver on this divisive proposal. When those other issues are considered, persisting with this proposal will see a high school for Bungendore postponed for many years to come,” Cr Preston said.

“Our position will be clear and our commitment to the Bungendore community to be a strong advocate for a properly located high school will be a matter of public record for which we will be held accountable. And I anticipate and expect that the community will ferociously hold us to this commitment.”

READ ALSO Street dining arrives in Queanbeyan’s CBD

The Save Bungendore Park group echoed this sentiment in an online post to its community, addressing the decision and suggesting blame should not be placed with council.

“As it stands, completion of a school on Bungendore Park any time in 2023 is looking doubtful, and even Term 1, 2024 looks optimistic,” the posted stated.

“These delays are not the fault of council or those in the community opposing the plan. They have been obvious since last year and are the fault of the Department of Education, which – with the support of John Barilaro – made a last-minute decision to change sites, without any consultation or due diligence.

“The best chance for a Bungendore High School, without further delay, is to build it on a site that doesn’t present the legal and planning difficulties facing this deeply troubled plan.”

Original Article published by Max O’Driscoll on Riotact.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
Greg Cameron5:44 pm 07 Feb 22

The opponents seems to be concerned about a swimming pool, a portion of the Mick Sherd oval, upgrading Bungendore public school, a library and something about using crown land for a public high school. They do not propose an alternative site. The three-year consultation program conducted by the Education Department was fine so far as I am concerned. The first priority is the children. The government wants to build a high school. Only a mug stands in the way.

Greg Cameron

Emma Brooks Maher7:20 pm 16 Mar 22

Sorry Greg – there was no “3-year Consultation program” – repeat NONE.
And the only “survey” they did was so sloppy, it’s an insult to the word – as for that police-supervised session at Bungendore Public School on 11 May 2021 – I was there. It wasn’t a ‘survey” – it was supposed to be an “information hub”. As such, it was a big failure.

The DoE guys there didn’t know north from south, or east from west about the local area – not even in terms of school catchment area. Didn’t have a clue about student capacity, heritage, or traffic patterns, or what the War Memorial means, or even how Mick Sherd Oval gets used. A farce.

The ONLY event that could even pretend to be a survey happened in 2020 when DoE asked for response re DESIGN PRINCIPLES that might make a good BHS. Nothing about location – repeat NOTHING. To call it “fine” just shows how little you know about VALID research or consultation.
The “survey” did ask if people liked the idea of “a BHS” – 74 people answered. Of those, 36% “strongly agreed”, about 25% thought it sounded OK, and the rest said no.

In short- less than 50 people out of a total population now around 4,000 were in favour of “A” High School – not this one, and NEVER about this site. It was a farce. It still is.

PS – your comment about “opponents” not proposing an alternative site is just plain wrong. At least THREE alternatives sites have been identified, and short-listed, by Property NSW – with one RECOMMENDED as “superior” for BHS. The so-called “opponents” have been ACTIVELY advocating for any one of these since 2020 !!!

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.