News

Argument against rate rise sinks as Bega Valley plans for six pools future

Ian Campbell 21 November 2019
Eden Memorial Pool. Photo: Eden Memorial Pool Facebook.

Eden Memorial Pool. Photo: Eden Memorial Pool Facebook.

The six swimming pools dotted around the inland villages of the Bega Valley are well-loved, but for that same community, the idea of paying extra to maintain and upgrade them has gone down like a Band-Aid floating in the shallow end.

Despite the local reaction to an increase in rates, Bega Valley Shire Councillors have voted seven to two to notify the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) of its intention to apply for a Special Rate Variation (SRV).

Leading up to this week’s meeting, Council conducted a number of information and engagement exercises to test the idea – including an online survey completed by 659 people. Despite 56% of respondents supporting the retention of Eden, Pambula, Candelo, Bega, Bemboka, and Cobargo pools, 53% said they were unwilling to pay more in their rates to upgrade and keep the six pools.

Around a dozen people turned out to meet with Bega Valley Shire Council at Bemboka Hall. Photo: Ian Campbell.

Around a dozen people turned out to meet with Bega Valley Shire Council at Bemboka Hall in August to discuss the SRV. Photo: Ian Campbell.

Wednesday’s meeting was described as “D-day, decision day” by Cr Tony Allen, who led the discussion in the chamber, moving a motion that would see the introduction of the 11% increase staggered over three years.

If approved by IPART, the SRV would see an increase in rates, above the rate peg, which would occur in equal increments starting in 2020-21, the full variation would only come into effect in the third year but remain for perpetuity.

“At the end of the day, we have to make decisions about assets this community owns, we need to stand tall and make the call, ” Cr Allen says.

For those who have campaigned against the hike, which will raise just over $2 million a year, Cr Allen says, “name the pool you’ll close first.”

Photo: Candelo Pool Facebook.

Candelo Pool is currently closed following structural issues. Photo: Candelo Pool Facebook.

Mitchell Nadin and Jo Dodds were the only two Councillors to speak against the rate rise, both keen to see other funding options explored.

Cr Nadin tried to defer the decision so that monies from the proposed sale of Southern Phone could be considered, along with other ideas.

“Now is not the right time [for a rate rise],” Cr Nadin says pointing to a slowing economy, drought and household budget pressures.

Cr Nadin describes pools as “a huge luxury item” pointing to other council responsibilities more deserving of an SRV.

“Pools are a thirsty resource,” Cr Dodds quips, “I am not comfortable with an SRV for one asset class, what else could we do with that money?”

“I’ll be accused of trying to close pools, or of trying to campaign for easy votes by opposing an SRV, but it’s never as simple as that. It’s never black or white.

“We are over-endowed with swimming pools per head of population.”

Aqua aerobics at Bemboka Pool. Photo: Sapphire Aquatic Facebook.

Aqua aerobics at Bemboka Pool. Photo: Sapphire Aquatic Facebook.

Their colleagues dismissed the arguments, confident that the last three years of consideration have informed a tough but in the end correct outcome.

“If we don’t do this we are effectively saying – close these pools,” Cr Russell Fitzpatrick says.

Eden’s Cr Sharon Tapscott says, “if you can keep them [pools] modern and up to date you will increase traffic.”

Cr Robyn Bain adds,”swimming is an essential component of our lives. We’ve looked at this inside out, back to front and upside down – there is no other way. We have done our due diligence.”

Mayor Kristy McBain says Council has done much to drive operational efficiency gains and contain services and suggests that Local Government needs to be better funded, “we account for just 3.7% of total taxation in Australia.”

“There are no current grants where the Bega Pool meets the criteria.

“The SRV will release money back into the general fund,” Cr McBain says adding that the NSW Forestry Corporation and National Parks and Wildlife Service should be paying rates.

“A community that has halls, libraries, galleries and pools are connected communities, that’s the community I want to be apart of.”

Cr McBain suggests that posturing ahead of next September’s Local Government election has skewed the discussion for political advantage.

Sapphire Aquatic Centre at Pambula. Photo: Sapphire Aquatic Facebook.

Sapphire Aquatic Centre at Pambula. Photo: Sapphire Aquatic Facebook.

The full outline of the rate increase will be presented to the Council meeting of December 11 in the draft operational plan for the 2020/21 year. This will be placed on public exhibition for an extended period until January 24.

The draft operational plan will include modelling for SRV expenditure over the first 10 years in which time Bega and Cobargo pools will be due for redevelopment.

The draft plan will also point to how money currently spent on pools from the general fund could be spent elsewhere in Council if the SRV is approved by IPART.

Council says the average increase on individual ratepayers will be $2.82 per household per week based on a land value of $204,000, that’s a rate increase of $146.82 per year.

“People will come back to us in years to come and say – thank goodness you had the guts,” Cr Allen says.

Mark and Zoe Philipzen took over the management of this community-owned pool four years ago. Photo: Ian Campbell

Mark and Zoe Philipzen leading swim squad sessions at Bega Pool. Photo: Ian Campbell

What's Your Opinion?

3 Responses to Argument against rate rise sinks as Bega Valley plans for six pools future

Filter
Order
Debra Bartlett 6:52 pm 28 Nov 19

Councillors, this is NOT a brave decision. A brave decision would be to cut your allowances, to oversee cut backs in ALL council expenditure and to manage ratepayers funds with care and frugality in the same way that we all have to. Trying to cause a schism in the community by saying “which pools do you want to close” is a cowards argument. Council has mismanaged funds in the past and not allocated enough money over many years to the pools. They pay a private operator to run some pools but do not take the income from attendees thereby putting ratepayers in a lose, lose situation. They already received a rate variation in the past for assistance with pool maintenance but mismanaged the use of that too. Ratepayers are not a bottomless pit which councillors can mine with impunity. Only when council can provide real value for money, real commitment to cost cutting and stringent money management can the ratepayers trust our elected and non -elected representatives.

Jeff de Jager 6:33 am 26 Nov 19

It sounds like council has been surprised by the pool’s need for attention just as the federal government has been surprised by the sudden and growing number of “senior citizens”.
Hello! It didn’t all happen out of the blue – it’s been coming for years! The moral, possibly out of place in this context, is that hard decisions need to be made in time when they initially surface, not any time later, as easy as it might seem to have them swept under the carpet.

Harry Watson Smith 9:09 pm 21 Nov 19

Name the swimming pool the community wishes to close first is the catch cry. OK I have seen this as the thin edge of the wedge.
The next catch cry before raising rates will be: Name the Library we need to close to save money or we will raise rates. (People dont read books any more!)
Why not ask the question: Which section of Council will we do away with or we will have to raise rates? Now that is a valid investigation.

Top