20 January 2025

Rural community members tell council why Moruya livestock yards should be left as they are

| Marion Williams
Join the conversation
14
diagram of animal shelter

Present day animal shelter and proposed location of new animal shelter located at Pollwombra Road, Moruya. Photo: Eurobodalla Shire Council website.

Three rural community members have told Eurobodalla Shire Council that the livestock yards in Moruya’s industrial estate were a necessity, and it was not practical to move them, temporarily or permanently, to the Moruya Showground.

Farmer Keith Dance, Patrick Jeffery who runs a livestock cartage business, and his mother Elizabeth Jeffery, addressed the council at the regular public access meeting on Tuesday (3 December).

They spoke in relation to a motion proposed at the 19 November council meeting regarding the construction of a new animal shelter. The meeting’s papers said the livestock yards were located nearby the animal shelter and were used intermittently.

“The site is occupied by numerous livestock pens used for the sale of livestock which have not occurred at the location for some time,” the background paper PSR24/020 said. “The livestock pens are used sporadically, and only accommodating one or two animals when in use.”

The PSR24/020 paper recommended the pens be dismantled and reconstructed within the carpark of the existing shelter temporarily until the old shelter is demolished. “Alternatively, as the livestock pens are used infrequently, the pens could be removed altogether, with the livestock yards at Moruya Showground used as the substitute.”

The yards are used to load livestock onto trucks to take them to sales. They are also used to rest and treat livestock on their journey.

The yards are used to load livestock onto trucks to take them to sales. They are also used to rest and treat livestock on their journey. Photo: File.

Mr Jeffery said small landholders and even larger ones needed the yards to load livestock to take them to sales.

“Ten days ago, I had 200 head of cattle at the yards. There is no way you can load those cattle on the farm,” he said. “We go to dozens of farms the day before and then take them to the sales.”

Mr Jeffery said it was the only suitable place between Nowra and Bega where transporters could stop to fix any issues.

Mrs Jeffery said it was the only designated sales yard in the area.

“It is a contained environment for livestock to be unloaded and rested, and to be treated, and it is a safe place during emergencies,” Mrs Jeffery said.

READ ALSO Dalmeny Matters submits 1000-plus signature petition to Eurobodalla Shire Council

She said livestock sales ceased there in 2020 during COVID and stock and station agent Stewart Smith from Bega stopped travelling to Moruya.

The yards were in limbo, then rumours spread that the yards would be demolished.

Mrs Jeffery and her husband Ray made a submission to take over the yards’ lease “because it is a necessity”.

“In our submission we said we would do all the necessary repairs to bring the yard back to use and do the ongoing maintenance,” Mrs Jeffery said. “We felt a duty to preserve an essential and historical facility.”

Councillor Phil Constable asked Mr Jeffery about the implications for small landholders if the yards were removed and replaced.

“Even some of the larger landholders could not carry on,” Mr Jeffery said. “There are people with 150 calves and beef farms without access to those facilities.” He said 30 to 50 landowners would be impacted by any change.

Livestock are marshalled in the yards at Moruya before being taken to sales.

Livestock are marshalled in the yards at Moruya before being taken to sales. Photo: File.

Mr Dance was against all of the proposed changes.

“It is impossible to relocate them to the carpark of the shelter because the trucks need a full turning circle,” he said.

Mr Dance said that after the Black Summer bushfires there were designated emergency places for livestock.

“To say we can put them in the Moruya Showground is wrong. That is where people gathered,” he said. “It is a flood zone so the livestock and heavy trucks couldn’t use it, so it isn’t a practical solution.”

Mr Dance said the animals and trucks made too much noise to be in an urban setting like the showground.

Mr Jeffery agreed, noting there were no houses near the livestock yards’ current location. “That is why people don’t realise how much it is used.”

READ ALSO Governor visits community-funded affordable housing in Bermagui, one of several in Bega Valley

Councillor Mick Johnson asked if anywhere could work temporarily.

Mr Jeffery said no, because it would have to be a new set of yards. “It has loading ramps and all-weather access so you are looking at hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars,” he said.

Councillor Colleen Turner asked Mr Dance and Mr Jeffery if there was enough room on the site to construct the new animal shelter without having to temporarily relocate the yards. Both men said there was, with Mr Jeffery adding he had experience in earthworks.

Mr Dance said the rural industries, which are such an important part of the shire, should have been consulted prior to the motion coming before council.

Mrs Jeffery said it would be a “great misfortune, historically and for animal welfare” to lose the yards.

“It is like a safety house. You know they are there if you are travelling and have trouble,” she said. “For all us rural people the livestock yards are a necessity.”

Join the conversation

14
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Richard McLeod5:35 pm 20 Jan 25

According to Trish “I got all of three votes” Hellier this is all the Council’s fault? Probably is but how so Trish? If you allegedly use something and just don’t pay for it isnt that just wrong? Maybe Trish forgets it is ratepayers money here or maybe she thinks all public assets should be leased (or just used for free) for private use to her mates? What a great idea. Would someone lease the Pav duck pond please!

Trish Hellier9:40 pm 19 Jan 25

It is being alleged that an Agent at Bega would collect the fee for the use of the Cattle Yard as this is where the Auctioneer was located. It is alleged that the Auctioneer retired and the fee had not been collected for some years and that there was a break down in the cross checking system at the ESC Council.
As stated above Mrs Jeffrey and her husband wrote to Council asking to lease the Sale Yards and they never received a reply.
I believe the fault lies with Council and no one is trying to any “freebies”.
Trish Hellier

patricia gardiner7:01 pm 16 Jan 25

Please Note:
* There is more than one livestock transporter in Eurobodlla.
* The idea to dismantle and reconstruct the yards would be extremely difficult(if not impossible) and very expensive as they are concreted in.
* The yards are not just utilised by local stock carriers but also their cattle farming clients and other carriers who have cause to unload due to animal welfare issues that arise while transporting stock.(Nowra to Bega stockyards = 262km)
* If a beast goes down in a truck, the truck must be unloaded to rectify the situation. If there is nowhere to unload, others will also go down.
* Council infrastructure is for everyone, Our rates pay for many things that not everybody wants or uses.
* Utilising the showground yards is problematic as they are in a residential area. Imagine the complaints regarding noise, smell, truck movements, particularly when stock need to be accommodated overnight.
* the information provided in the report to Councillors was inaccurate.
CONSIDER:
* What are the ongoing costs to council to retain the stockyards as compared to the ongoing costs of the Bay Pav, for example?

Yes we need a new Animal Shelter.
Yes we need to retain the existing stockyards.
The 2 do not need to be mutually exclusive, as I understand it, there is an alternative site for the new Animal Shelter just above the stockyards.

Jenny Knowles4:07 pm 17 Jan 25

Yet more half baked news. Use of the saleyards requires a fee to be paid. It is set out in the Council fees and charges! A good question to Council is when was the last fee actually paid by those who allegedly use these yards? People who want a free ride off taxpayers/ratepayers usually cry loudest when they are meant to pay a small fee but apparently just don’t. I’m surprised the keyboard experts think that is ok.

Susanne Page11:28 am 14 Jan 25

Good on the 3 loud voices who spoke up about keeping the saleyards. Years of experience between them, living a ‘real’ rural life not one pandering to tourists and tree/sea changers. It is easy for newcomers to look at what’s here and not know why it is. Just because you don’t see what is happening doesn’t mean it has no purpose.

Richard McLeod5:48 pm 15 Jan 25

There are always loud voices trying to protect their own personal freebie ratepayer funded facility. The rural way is be honest, pay and don’t bludge? Or is it?

Richard McLeod6:37 pm 10 Dec 24

Usual armchair experts Trish and Pattie at their ill-informed best. The idea was to start the process to build a new animal pound (much needed) and move the sale yards on the same site. These ‘sale yards’ are only used by one business, as per the Council presentation by the actual business on the day! Talk about wanting to keep a freebie going. They don’t even tell Council when they use it every week or even pay a fee. Like a freebie resource for the transport firm to make money off. How’s that for a fair (free) go Pattie?

patricia gardiner6:08 pm 06 Dec 24

Why did ESC not consult rural stakeholders prior to putting forward the proposal to remove the saleyards?
It is time council realised our shire is not just about tourism. Our rural ratepayers deserve a ‘fair go’.

Jenny Knowles7:21 pm 10 Dec 24

Did you read the report? Such fake and false news. Time to go back to primary school.

Rural Community members, how misleading. Surely you mean 3 people with vested interests.
Has Mr Dance ever approved pf any change.
Come on council, you are elected by the whole community to serve all, not just 3 loud voices.

Trish Hellier9:06 pm 09 Dec 24

Attuross did you watch the council meeting of the 19th November 2024? This subject came up in relation to the Council Pound. Those presenting at Public Access did so as it would appear that little thought was given to the affect of moving or reducing the sale yards, people with knowledge and hands on experience. Trish Hellier

Jenny Knowles7:23 pm 10 Dec 24

Seems the vested interests and local old mates swayed Clr Pollock, Johnson and Winslade. Shame on those Councillors for not upgrading the awful animal pound.

Susanne Page11:35 am 14 Jan 25

If you have lived here long enough you would know these 3 people do not have ‘vested’ interests just for themselves. They belong to the rural part of our community and have been here many years more than most. Many out there are pleased that they spoke up on their behalf. As we pander to the tourism dollar it is easy to forget we are still a rural area and the needs of this part of our community must be considered.

The old “if you have lived here long enough” chestnut is overly used and also ignorantly used here, as Ms Page has no idea how long I have lived here.
For her information, it is around 50 years, plenty of time to know who loudly always tries to preserve their self-interest and one in particular, who has opposed every proposed change for the public good I can think of.
A science denying man of very little horizons, who thinks he is entitled to claim his views are those of everyone, or at should be. Let’s say, a slightly larger than average hobby farmer who thinks he is Tuross’s answer to Yellowstone.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.