1 April 2022

Pennie Scott looking to bring Independent thinking to the Riverina

| Max O'Driscoll
Join the conversation
5
woman in hat

Independent Pennie Scott wants to be the next Member for Riverina. Photo: Supplied.

Pennie Scott has held many roles throughout her life. A mother of five sons, a farmer, an academic, the founding editor of a Wagga newspaper and much more.

However years of disenchantment with the Federal Government, particularly with her local member Michael McCormack, has set Ms Scott’s sights on something new; she wants to be the next Member for Riverina.

An Independent candidate living in the north of the electorate near Cowra, Ms Scott knows victory will not be easy but believes she’s obliged to try to “balance the injustices” in government.

“I’d say basically since the Howard days, we’ve become entrenched in political behaviours which are not serving the Australian people well at all,” Ms Scott said.

“The shift has changed from serving business and serving corporate and it’s the people of Australia who are just simply the pawns these days.

“People are telling me we need change and we need that common sense back in our political areas. And often it’s us country people who are very resourceful, very practical and good at self-sufficiency, who actually have the lived experiences to apply that into a wider sense and to actually question decisions that are made.”

READ ALSO Michael Organ hopes to overcome the odds a second time and win the Riverina

Ms Scott believes that the current Coalition Government have failed to be transparent, particularly around their relationships with corporate entities. She used this as an example of one factor influencing the “demise of our rural towns”.

“To see the demise of the countryside in the name of advanced innovative agriculture is absolute nonsense. We do need to grow food and we can grow beautiful food, but not in this corporate style,” she said.

“I see so many farmers now saying, ‘The Nationals do not represent us. They are a mining company, not The Nationals party’.”

As for local issues she’d like to see addressed, Ms Scott mentioned remaining black spots on the Riverina’s roads, the inland rail corridor which she described as a “Nationals party gravy train” and a review of the Murray Darling Basin Plan. She added that more needs to be done to combat the fastest-growing population of homeless people, women aged over 55; an issue she believes is especially pertinent in Wagga.

Ms Scott said Independent Dr Joe McGirr’s election as Member for Wagga Wagga is a source of great optimism for her. She argues that people are “fed up with being taken for granted” by the Liberal and Nationals parties.

“After the Liberal Party had held the state seat for 60 years, I think this is a really important shift in attitude and Joe McGirr is a wonderful member to be Independent,” Ms Scott said.

“People say that Wagga will never change, but that’s not true anymore and Joe is living proof of that.”

READ ALSO Communities ‘bear brunt’ of climate disasters, councillors across Australia call for federal action

Her attempted step into politics was inspired by frustration at current member Michael McCormack’s lack of accessibility to the community. Mr McCormack won the 2019 Federal election, achieving nearly 60 per cent of the first preference votes.

While she acknowledged a victory would require a remarkable turnaround from voters, Ms Scott believes that the “mood is changing” after an interesting three-year period.

“There is a viable alternative and in the last election in 2019, there were only four candidates. This time there are seven and for the first time in a very long time, there is a woman candidate,” she said.

After the Federal Budget’s release on Wednesday (30 March), an announcement from the Morrison Government on the election date is imminent. The election is due on or before 21 May.

Join the conversation

5
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Pennie
I cannot even think about ever adding you to my vote list at all. Sorry, but from a few previous meetings with you one official and just my observations over the years, is why I have come to this conclusion.

You, as I have said to you, you are trying to get a ride on the “Gravey train” on emotion issues with no foundations.
I do feel you have left your run far too late, plus you don’t list your favoured true political allies.

take care
Chris

Well said mate, a total grub if ever I’ve met one. Do you know if the idiot got in? Hopefully commonsense prevailed and she was soundly sent packing. Fake self absorbed, self centred and just a grub really.

Colin Wilson0428638705mobile9:58 pm 10 Apr 22

Congratulations Ms.Scott for having a go.An interesting point I raise is that our federal constitution does not mention the word “political Party”What the Australian People in most Australian colonies,as they were then in the eighteen hundreds voted on to support a constitution for a federal government made up of representatives.It was only after federation that members of the house of reps grouped together to form political parties.One wonders if we might be better governd by a house of independents?

Colin Wilson0428638705mobile9:46 pm 10 Apr 22

Just one drawback to putting your land ownership into a discretionary trust.If the NSW state revenue find out they will bill you land tax based on the property UCV in NSW

Colin Wilson0428638705mobile7:12 pm 10 Apr 22

Hello Ms.Scott,your mention of corporate business,raises a subject I have tried in vain to get highlighted.Recent federal legislation to help small business post covid has been passed allowing small business entities (less than 5million$ annual turnover) to write back losses post june2020 to the previous financial year that has a tax liability.But the legislation is only for companies or public trust,but not a trading didcretionary trust like my family business.I believe that many small family businesses including farms,operate like mine with a disc.trust (only family benificories) holding the assetts and renting the assetts to a family pty,ltd company.It is a assett protective method and quite legit.As this legislation was desiened to assist small business effected by the covid 19 downturn.It is discriminating and unfair.Perhaps you may raise the issue.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.