21 February 2026

Near $10 million solar farm proposed for Far South Coast town

| By Claire Sams
Join the conversation
3
solar panels on roof

The development – consisting of a five megawatt (MW) solar farm and battery system – has been proposed for a site off the Princes Highway near Cobargo. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

A development application (DA) has been lodged for a solar farm and battery system near Cobargo on the NSW South Coast.

The project’s DA was submitted to Bega Valley Shire Council by EDPR Australia Pty Ltd.

It is listed with a $9,570,000 price tag.

The documents state that, if given the green light, the Cobargo Microgrid Solar Farm would feature a five megawatt (MW) farm, with a DC capacity of 7.4 MWp, across a development area of 13.42 hectares.

About 10,620 solar modules would be installed in 177 rows, with seven metres between the rows.

Each module would be about 2.6 metres high.

“The development will not cause fragmentation or alienation of resource land as livestock grazing may continue beneath and around the solar array when the facility is constructed and operating,” an environmental effects report states.

There would also be an inverter station, as well as two 3.4 MW inverters.

The site is currently used for grazing and is located just over two kilometres south-west of Cobargo.

READ ALSO AGL considers reviving Dalton gas power station project as council calls for ‘meaningful’ public consultation

A nearby resident, who asked not to be identified, said there had been no consultation with the community or nearby landholders around this proposal, before the DA lodgement.

They also said that while landowners had been approached several years ago, they had pushed back against it.

The resident said they would be writing to the council, advocating against the DA, and alleged there were inaccuracies in the DA documents.

“The Cobargo area will have no benefit … There’s no benefit if we have a major disaster.”

The resident told Region they weren’t satisfied with the proposed development, pointing to its visual impact on the landscape (including on their “lovely view”) and its glare risk.

The DA proposes a series of trees, which would be planted around the solar farm to help shield it from view.

“The overall impact on landscape character is assessed to be high for both private property and the public domain,” a report examining the planned project’s visual impact states.

“However, the presence of roadside, riparian and boundary vegetation and clusters of trees within properties, the undulating topography and the backdrop of vegetated ranges temper the effects on landscape character.”

The resident said they didn’t believe this would be enough to shield it from view, saying the trees would “take 20 years” to grow.

A map showing the proposed design of the site

If approved, the development would be located across a 13.42-hectare site. Image: Supplied.

The resident also had concerns the project’s planned use of cut and fill risked contaminating Wallaga Lake after a significant flood, and that glare from the panels might result in eye complications in residents.

A report into the proposed project’s potential for glint and glare studied more than 40 sites within two kilometres of the site.

It states that most of the glare was identified in the early mornings and late evenings, and one minute of ‘yellow case’ – a kind of glare which can cause an afterimage – was identified.

None of the sites evaluated are believed to receive more than nine minutes of glare in a day.

READ ALSO Temporary closures in popular national park for ‘once-in-a-lifetime’ improvements

In a statement to Region, an EDP Renewables Australia spokesperson said the proposed solar farm was intended to strengthen the town’s energy security.

“The location and design enable the project to act as a microgrid to power Cobargo even if the town is disconnected from the main grid. … In addition, the integration of battery storage and ‘island mode’ functionality further enables the town to operate independently from the broader grid during outages, ensuring continuity of supply when it is needed most.”

The spokesperson said “numerous meetings” had been held with the community, pointing to discussions with adjacent neighbours in 2023 that were used to directly inform the project’s final design.

If approved, the solar farm is expected to operate for about 35 years (depending on market conditions), with that period not including its construction and decommissioning.

Documents lodged with the DA indicate that the Southern Regional Planning Panel will ultimately assess the proposal.

The DA, with the application number 20/2026, can be viewed through the council’s website. People can make submissions until 2 March.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

3
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

The objections to this proposal simply smack of NIMBYism. Our community needs electricity, reliable supplies of electricity. This is a relatively small solar farm (and solar farms now seem to be an environmentally friendly, well-accepted source of energy) intended to benefit the local community. The South Coast cannot and must not simply reject solar farms in our area just because they are ‘in our backyard’, so the knee-jerk opposition to this proposal should be strongly condemned. The unnamed objectors simply are suggesting they will be affected by glare – but ignore the fact that the solar farm will be completely surrounded by trees to mitigate any effect of glare on locals. The objectors must now identify themselves and provide verifiable proof that this proposal will adversely affect them, and that their objections significantly outweigh the broader community’s benefits from the project. They can properly do this by objecting to the application for the Council’s DA – not by attempting to whip up uninformed community hysteria. Sorry, suitable trees don’t take 20 years to grow…the risk of contaminating Wallaga Lake (miles and miles away) ‘after a significant flood’ is remote and could be controlled in the remote event of ‘a significant flood’ which is hardly likely to impact the hilltop location of this proposed solar farm.!

cannedbeeria8:46 pm 22 Apr 26

Thanks Peter. Here’s some science:
Trees+ 1million years + mining+pollution= oil. Oil+refining+more pollution=fuel. Fuel+more pollution=heat. Heat=steam. Steam+power stations=more pollution+electricity! Yay!
Or, sun+solar=electricity! Yay again.
The ultimate cutting out of the middle man.

What another waste of taxpayers money to solve something that does not exist While we just tick over 1 trillion in debt they waste money on these failed systems Even NEMO stated this week renewables are a policy failure people should read their report

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.