16 May 2025

NSW Government rejects calls to repeal brumby protection law despite public petition

| By Edwina Mason
Join the conversation
11
Brumbies at Currango Plains in the Kosciuszko National Park, May 2018. Photo: Supplied by John Barilaro's office.

Brumbies at Currango Plains in the Kosciuszko National Park. Photo: Supplied.

The NSW Government has ruled out repealing the controversial Kosciuszko Wild Horse Heritage Act, despite mounting pressure from conservationists and thousands of petitioners who argue the law protects feral horses at the expense of endangered wildlife and fragile alpine ecosystems.

Introduced in 2018 by the former Coalition government, the act recognises wild horses — or brumbies — as having “heritage value” and mandates their ongoing presence in the park.

It has long faced criticism from scientists, environmental groups and the public for giving legal priority to an invasive species over native biodiversity.

Independent MP for Wagga Wagga Dr Joe McGirr recently tabled a petition with more than 11,000 signatures in parliament, calling for the legislation to be scrapped.

READ ALSO Conservationists call on NSW Parliament to repeal Barilaro’s ‘Brumby Bill’

Dr McGirr described the act as “an artificial construct that goes against logic”, and said it enshrined protection for an invasive species that “trample wetlands and pollute waterways”, compact soil and contribute to erosion.

“They are large, hard-hoofed animals without natural predators and they live in an environment that has not evolved to cope with them,” he said.

“Would we legislate to protect foxes, goats or pigs in our national parks? Would it make any sense to have a ‘Kosciuszko Wild Pig Heritage Act?'”

While acknowledging the cultural and emotional attachment many Australians had to brumbies, Dr McGirr said environmental reality must take precedence.

Responding on behalf of NSW Environment Minister Penny Sharpe, Member for Bankstown Jihad Dib reaffirmed the government’s commitment to reducing the brumby population to 3000 by 2027 under the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan (KNP WHHMP).

A 2023 National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) survey estimated around 17,000 wild horses in the park. Mr Dib said 9036 had been removed since late 2021, with more than 1000 rehomed.

Preliminary 2025 estimates put the population at around 3000.

While thanking the petitioners, Mr Dib said repealing the legislation was not currently a government priority.

“The NSW Government does not consider repeal of the Kosciuszko Wild Horse Heritage Act 2018 to be a priority at this time,” he told the chamber.

Shadow Environment Minister James Griffin said protecting the park’s unique ecosystem must come first, and backed regular independent reviews to ensure horse management remains humane and based on best practice.

“Science and data must lead the way to ensure Kosciuszko National Park thrives for decades to come,” he said.

Several Labor MPs supported repealing the act including Blue Mountains MP Trish Doyle who called the legislation “reckless and short-sighted”, and said repeal was “not off the table”.

Monaro MP Steve Whan labelled the act “an appalling piece of legislation”, saying he would have opposed it if he had been in parliament when it passed.

While acknowledging that many of his constituents supported brumby protections, Mr Whan said the act was at odds with the conservation purpose of a national park.

Greens MP Kobi Shetty echoed that view, calling the legislation incompatible with protecting the park’s biodiversity and water systems.

“This bizarre plan does nothing to protect this precious, pristine and unique environment,” she said.

In closing, Dr McGirr thanked supporters of the petition and emphasised the need to prioritise science over sentiment.

“Taking in all of today’s speeches together … there is a clear direction that we need to take: we need to continue to work for the repeal of this act,” he said.

Afterwards, Invasive Species Council CEO Jack Gough said the lack of opposition during debate showed a major political shift.

“Not a single opposition voice spoke in parliament — that alone shows how far the politics has moved,” he said.

Mr Gough noted support for repeal from Dr McGirr, the Liberals, Greens and senior Labor ministers, including Monaro MP Steve Whan.

“The ridiculous Barilaro law was never based on science — it was a political stunt to protect a population of destructive feral horses in Australia’s fragile alpine national park,” he said.

“Barilaro was on his own when this act came in, and now that he’s out of parliament, it has no friends — apart from a few fringe voices in the Upper House,” he said.

The law mandates 3000 brumbies remain in the park — animals Mr Gough says are “trashing and trampling” ecosystems, posing risks to drivers and polluting the headwaters of the Murray and Murrumbidgee rivers.

“There are clearly the numbers in parliament to overturn this bad law. We now need Premier Minns to step up and make it happen,” he said.

READ ALSO The irony of the brumby and Snowy 2.0 sharing the same backyard

However, brumby advocate and former Monaro MP Peter Cochran said the government must now adhere to the legislation it had chosen to uphold.

“First and foremost, they’re obliged to report population numbers in a timely fashion,” he said. “I don’t know how they can claim to be sticking to the plan when they can’t even do that.”

Mr Cochran argued that Snowy 2.0 construction work was pushing horses out of retention zones into areas where they were being targeted and said the management plan should be revised accordingly.

He also called for greater local input into the plan, rather than relying on “city-based bureaucrats”.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

11
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Richard McLeod8:58 pm 19 May 25

Dame of the Deua to the rescue again.

Stop The Obviously Cruel Brumby Cull3:29 pm 19 May 25

Why does this piece/article have six anti-Brumby Campaigners quoted (that keep pushing for even more Animal Cruelty within the KNP and elsewhere) all citing the usual misleading in-error Cull propaganda that has nothing to do with just how illegitimate and CRUEL this recent slaughter of our Brumbies has been, and just one pro-Brumby person was quoted?

Why is there (again) little or no focus on the facts surrounding this abhorrent Cull, such as the complete lack of evidence to support the past year or so’s cruelty of the Cull i.e. the absence of even just a single image of a dead or injured Native Animal proven to be caused by a Wild Horse (because those images do not exist). And yet as each year passes, more and more articles are published on the actual reasons Native Animals such as the Corroboree Frog and Broad Tooth Rat are under threat, that has nothing to do with our sentient, non-predatory, non-carnivorous, hardly damaging Wild Horses/Brumbies.

And there still is little evidence of real or obvious damage within the KNP created by Horses when compared to the Human Damage throughout the Park where Horses/Brumbies exist(ed).

At worst, if one looks hard enough, one can find some tiny hoof prints (that in fact ‘till’ / aerate the open plains there) some occasional horse manure (a good soil improver/fertiliser) and very narrow horse trails (images can be provided upon request) that our horses regularly follow that hikers use to traverse the terrain in there in the same way they use the much more prevalent/obvious roads and paths and camping grounds and open plains created therein by humans.

Its actually disgraceful that a handful of select images (usually of some hoof prints near a river or tributary that could easily also/equally be pig and deer damage) produced by the ALP and the ISC etc have been used by them and the Media to justify the cruel/abhorrent Slaughter of well over a thousand (and if we believe Ms Sharpe over 6,000+) Wild Horses within the KNP.

Philip Creagh4:00 pm 18 May 25

Anyone who has visited the area regularly, as I have, mainly in the northern and southern part over 60 years noticed two things.

1. The horse population has fluctuated quite a lot. Most noticeably during the millennial drought the numbers dropped off substantially the numbers came back after about 2005 and then a decline between about 2017 and 2020.
Since then the numbers have increased. I rarely noticed damage to the river edges, however smaller creeks and swampy areas had obvious signs of damage. Until I was told otherwise I always felt the damage was by pigs, they are really obvious in the northern part (I still think so).

2. The Southern part, especially around Tin Mine Hut and the Thredbo river is a different story. Here there are many Sambar deer and they have caused noticeable damage to many parts of the river. Especially the Diggings and Ngarigo have obvious damage, which is quite different to the damage seen on say the Eucumbene and Upper ‘Bidgee.
There is plenty of proof that horses are photographed near the ‘scene of the crime’, any logical scientist would be seeking proof they are a threat to the creatures/diversity.
Immutable scientific principles underpinning these studies should be:
1. Actually prove that a species is, in fact, in decline – don’t be a chicken little.
2. If there is no decline, save money for other real threats.
3. Identify what is actually causing the decline – horse, pig disturbance, rabbit etc.
4. If there is a decline investigate a cost effective appropriate control method.

The damage caused by pigs has been ignored, the so called ‘conservationists’ have latched onto the ‘obvious animal’ and away we go … the Tiwi Islands all over again.
Eliminating horses, in a fundamentalist ‘conservationist’ way, is an impossibility in KNP.

Even Liberal Party members are calling the legislation flawed. These horses do not have heritage value over and above the value that exists naturally, the value that has evolved over millions of years. But we need to acknowledge the significant inroads the current government has made to reduce the number of horses in the park. I think also those advocating for horses misrepresent the management plan. The plan allows for NO MORE THAN 3000 horses in all the retention zones and it clearly states horses will not be released into retention zones to keep that number. If the horses wander outside the retention zone they can be removed. I saw a video of people (on horses) pushing feral mobs out of exclusion zones and into a retention zone. Is that right? Stop whinging Peter Cochran. There are still plenty of horses there to show your customers.

The real problem is the NSW Environment Minister who doesn’t want to rock the boat. This, despite the ridiculous situation caused by a handful of well organised horse tragics and an ex MP promoting their narrow self-interests. The feral horses despoil and destroy one of the most beautiful but fragile ecosystems in Australia. Come on Minister Sharpe!- use some common sense, show a bit of spine and put an end to this farcical legislation enshrining feral animals in a glorious National Park

Lynne Miller1:43 pm 18 May 25

KNP doesn’t look too glorious from the air where bulldozers have destroyed kilometres of it, huge snow gums mowed down with no thought what so ever to the importance of these trees to the native birds, mammals, insects and reptiles that rely on them.
Snowy Hydro 2, is an abomination, an absolute disgraceful mess. The plan to turn KNP into a playground for wealthy adventure seekers, mountain bikers, recreational 4×4 use, is more damaging to the once pristine park. The ancestors of current day Brumbies have coexisted with native fauna for over 200 years, with minimal damage to the native flora except when the are mercilessly hunted, chased, terrified and running for their lives and peppered with bullets and left to die, slow, painful, unwarranted deaths left to rot and become food for pigs.
Horses are sentient beings, they show love, they feel pain, grief, loss, which are human traits. There is NOTHING HUMANE about how the numbers of wild living Brumbies are being controlled. The numbers were grossly exaggerated to begin with. Long live the Brumbies.

One feral horse in any park , is one too many .Barilaro’s idiotic law should be repealed while there is still a national park to enjoy . The government was elected to safeguard the interests of ALL the people , not to pander to the horsey set who would rather see our national parks and their unique environment destroyed .

patricia gardiner5:21 pm 16 May 25

Mr Cochran needs to understand that it is not only ‘city bureaucrats’ that oppose this environmentally destructive legislation, it is a majority of the states population, regardless of where they live or whether they be bureaucrats or not.
It is up to the government to repeal legislation that has proven to be counter-productive to its intent – legislation protecting feral horses is environmentally destructive and mustr be repealed.

Lynne Miller2:09 pm 18 May 25

Pretty sure that the majority of Australians would be mortified if they were shown the truth. Somehow only one side of the story is told and a very distorted and fictitious side it is.
Humans are killing KNP and .any other parks Australia-wide, for recreational activities, Snowy Hydro 2.0, to make $’s to increase personal wealth, more than decreasing foreign debt.
Humans can’t bulldoze ancient native trees and replace them with pine plantations at the expense of our native fauna and try to blame wild living Brumbies for destruction of habitat.
Do some first hand research, don’t rely on the falsehoods that Penny Sharpe and co are brainwashing people with.
Be kind people, there is room for all to share.

patricia gardiner4:48 pm 16 May 25

Mr Dib declares, “repealing the legislation [is] not currently a government priority.”
Well why not? Mr Dib.
Any sane and sensible person recognises the need to protect unique and endangered species and ecosystems. Why can’t you and your govt understand such a simple but vital priority?
Why thank those that signed the partition, and then do nothing?
Shame, shame, shame on state Labor!

patricia gardiner5:24 pm 16 May 25

Mr Dib declares, “repealing the legislation [is] not currently a government priority.”
Well why not? Mr Dib.

Any sane and sensible person recognises the need to protect unique and endangered species and ecosystems. Why can’t you and your govt understand such a simple but vital priority?
Why thank those that signed the petition, and then do nothing?
Shame, shame, shame on state Labor!

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.