11 October 2024

Grim scenes as Kosciuszko opens again to the public after seven-month aerial shooting cull

| Edwina Mason
Join the conversation
21
dead brumby

After a seven-month closure, Kosciuszko National Park is now open to the public. But those who visited it at the weekend say it is littered with horse carcasses. Photo: Silver Springs Equine.

WARNING: This article contains images that may distress some readers.

If it wasn’t the sight of horse carcasses that repulsed visitors as they entered Kosciuszko National Park (KNP) when it opened to the public on the October long weekend, it was the smell.

Ian Brown, who has bushwalked through the park clocking up an average 17 kilometres almost daily for 10 years, said the stench was overwhelming.

“I wasn’t sure what to expect after the NSW Government’s action in culling the brumbies up here. But it’s the smell that’s most disturbing,” he said, “because that’s what comes home with you, it gets into your clothes, seems to stay in your nose and only a shower seems to get rid of it.”

He fears the worst is yet to come. With daytime temperatures still in the low teens, he warns the mountains will reek once it warms up and the still intact carcasses start decomposing.

Large sections of Kosciuszko National Park, in the north and south, were closed to the public over a seven-month period from 4 March to 4 October this year as the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) undertook an aerial shooting program to reduce populations of introduced species including deer, pigs and wild horses, known as brumbies.

Based on an October 2023 population survey, there were between 12,797 and 21,760 wild horses in the park.

By law, NPWS is obliged to reduce the population to 3000 in 32 per cent of the park – in areas associated with wild horse heritage values – by June 2027 to reduce impacts on the park’s fragile alpine and sub-alpine environment.

READ ALSO Upper House MP upbraids wild horse rehoming program and minister calls for improved compliance

When traditional methods of culling – bait and trapping, rehoming and ground shooting – failed to meet population control targets, aerial shooting was authorised in October 2023, ending a 23-year ban in NSW.

That ban had been introduced following public backlash after 606 horses were culled in Guy Fawkes River National Park, a handful of those wounded left to die slowly in the days that followed.

The NPWS this week confirmed 8950 horses had been removed from KNP since a Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan was introduced in 2021.

“Of these, 4698 horses were removed during the recent winter closure of the northern section,” a spokesperson said.

This followed a cull of about 1360 horses in southern KNP between November, when aerial culling began, and April 2024.

In July, NSW Environment Minister Penny Sharpe told a NSW Upper House inquiry the cost of the wild horse culling operation to the NSW Government sat at $8.2 million.

The same inquiry, established on 28 August 2023 to inquire into and report on the proposed aerial shooting of brumbies in KNP, saw interrogation of RSPCA responses to aerial shooting standard operating procedures (SOP).

The RSPCA has always maintained aerial culling is less stressful to a horse than rehoming, given culling takes seconds but rehomed horses have to endure trapping and travelling in an enclosed space over a period of time.

dead brumby

Many of the carcasses have been found in heavily vegetated areas of the park. Photo: Silver Springs Equine.

But this has been challenged by local, Rocky Harvey, who rode through the park at the weekend. From what he observed, the wild horses were chased off the vast plains and into the treelines where they were subsequently shot.

“Not a single carcass was spotted in open terrain,” he told Region. “I saw it and everyone else I have heard from found the same – dead horses in the trees – even though it is well documented that open terrain is their preferred habitat.”

Mr Harvey said the NPWS H009 Aerial Shooting SOP was clear; that “chase time should be kept to a minimum” and “chase time is an important contributor to duration of stress”.

“Imagine the terror horses experience being chased by a helicopter for hundreds of metres, maybe thousands, then your family group is picked off one by one,” he said.

“Even if each horse was killed instantly by the first shot, how can it be justified that the chase is humane?”

He maintained the SOP stated NPWS sharpshooters should only shoot when the target area could be clearly seen and “shooters may target the chest and head only”.

“I can’t see how anyone can get a clear line of sight on a horse’s chest unless they’re side-on, not directly above, and how does that happen if the chopper needs to have a safe clearance above trees?” he asked.

Brumby advocates who scoured the park over the three days on foot, horseback and in vehicles, were charged with the grim task of counting the dead. They discovered 374 carcasses, ears removed, some slumped over logs, lying largely under the mountain canopy.

They too believe many of the wild horses were mustered off the plains and into the sights of ground shooters.

READ ALSO Aerial shooting of Kosciuszko’s wild horses to continue after Supreme Court challenge fails

Mr Brown claimed most of the carcasses he’d come across since the park officially reopened were littered with bullets way outside the SOP target anatomical zones. Some were heavily pregnant mares.

“You can tell which horses were shot from above because of the wounds on their backs and bums,” he said.

“Some have just one bullet hole in their backs and others you can see the holes in their stomachs and legs and neck, there’s no way these animals haven’t suffered miserable deaths.”

The minister has always maintained the removal of wild horses was made in accordance with the highest possible animal welfare standards and the NPWS undertook to use skilled and competent shooters and appropriate firearms and ammunition in a manner that resulted in the most rapid death possible.

Inquiry chair Animal Justice Party MP Emma Hurst said ever since aerial shooting began, distressed members of the public have contacted her office.

“We’ve received photos of shot horses that are very graphic and disturbing,” she said. “There is no way this could possibly be considered humane.”

She confirmed the five-hearing inquiry had been completed, the draft report was now with the Senate committee and expected to be released in coming weeks.

The NSW RSPCA was contacted for comment but is yet to respond.

The NPWS said the 2024 annual horse population survey would occur across Kosciuszko National Park in October and November. The survey will again involve aerial transects by helicopter with trained observers.

Parts of KNP will be closed for aerial pest control from 11-20 November, but the NPWS confirmed wild horses were not being targeted in the operation.

Join the conversation

21
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Stop The Obviously Cruel Brumby Cull5:29 pm 17 Oct 24

The illegitimacy of this Wild Horse Cull is only matched by the incompetent greed of the RSPCA that enabled such abhorrent Animal Cruelty that it knew could only be barbaric when it was to be done by incompetent Fleming Parks NSW Shooters shooting from moving Helicopters at franticly running horses fleeing from a Helicopter blazing bullets at it as it honed down on each of of them each time. A Cull/Slaughter under the direction of Sharpe’s ALP in NSW. Coleman (RSPCA) is a disgrace to allow this method or Horse Management, and the name of the organisation should be changed to reflect that it enables Cruelty not Prevents it. Shame on the RSPCA for allowing this disgusting cruelty and sitting back on its greedy hands and doing NOTHING.

An Ecologist11:31 am 17 Oct 24

Pigs can legally be poisoned. More efficient than shooting. Horses cant.

An Ecologist11:23 am 17 Oct 24

This whole two decade farce has rested on the failure of politicians and other leaders to appreciate that wildlife management is a technical profession. The published scientific evidence on animal welfare is starkly clear that in cases such as this, heli-shooting is WAY MORE HUMANE than any alternatives. Yet self appointed ‘experts’ keep saying otherwise. It is exactly the same with counting. Politicians entertained that self-named ‘independent biostatistician’ in 2023 who claimed that she was an expert in everything statistical even though she had never counted any wildlife population. A lot of what she said about horse and kangaroo counts was misunderstanding, misreading, or mistakes. She claimed there were at most a few hundred horses but almost 9,000 have been shot so far as at the latest NPWS report, during the process of reducing the population to 3,000. And yet there are still plenty of horses remaining if you go and look.

Disgraceful! This cruelty shows me exactly what the people running nsw and the rspca nsw are! Having been a horse owner in SA for over 50 years I’m horrified that these innocent animals were so cruelly treated. There is no excuse for any human to inflict so much pain and fear onto any animal ever. Especially a government agency and a minister who is supposed to have some intelligence and integrity. Sadly both lacking in this instance. This is nothing but environmental vandalism as the affect to that park is negative due to the revolting mess left from this massacre. Besides that there is current peer reviewed scientific evidence that wild horse herds increase biodiversity which is why the rest of the world is reintroducing herds to degraded land GO FIGURE?!? Shame on you Rspca Nsw and the Nsw ALP you will go down in history as the cruelest humans ever and who have wasted so much tax payers money on a completely unnecessary kill. Horses are so sensitive they feel a fly land on them they are family oriented and they are companion animals who deserve so much better!

You talk about environmental vandalism because horses and other invasive species are shot and left to rot but you neglect the vandalism associated with the many years of agitation from people such as yourself who can only see horses are good things. That agitation caused the horse numbers to rise which in turn necessitated lethal control. Horses are not innocent of damage. You also speak of scientific evidence supporting horses in the wild. All these investigations happened where horses used to be. Australia was not one of them and you cannot compare Australian biodiversity with Europe. One trial that supported the re-wilding of horses also supported re-wilding with pigs. Now we all know that does not work in Australia. Go figure that! I get it that people like you love horses but you just have to put it all in perspective. I love my horses too but they stay behind the fence unless I am riding.

An Ecologist11:28 am 17 Oct 24

Get some facts Pat:
Animals are never guilty. Animals are never innocent.
They are not being cruelly treated according to the science.
There is every ‘excuse’, no obligation, for humans to take responsibility for the impacts of the horses on our precious alpine areas.
The current peer reviewed scientific evidence is the opposite of what you claim.

Philip Creagh5:12 pm 13 Oct 24

It is interesting following the discussion about the horses in KNP. Much has been made that suddenly the horses have become an ‘environmental issue of earth shattering importance’. Peter Philp believes the ‘damage will take decades to repair’.

In the close on 60 years I have regularly visited the northern, southern and Geehi side of KNP I have observed horses, pigs, deer, wild dogs and rabbits. The numbers go up and down with the season and with what’s happening with the weather. There was a strong reduction in numbers in the early 1900’s and 2000’s as the rainfall and snow cover severely impacted the carrying capacity. I believe the horse numbers have been exaggerated – government departments are not averse to miscalculations to suit their agenda, for example see the Grey Nurse shark scandal, of 2007. The huge increase in horses since 2006 is not justified even with a most optimistic level of fecundity in the equine.

Scientists have decided that ultra small native animals and river banks are declining due to the horse population alone. ‘Let’s eliminate the horses and all will be well’. I have a fairly good knowledge of carrying capacity and the effects of species variability. I predict that in the next few years the number of pigs will fill the vacuum left by the sudden removal of such a large number of horses. Pigs can farrow twice a year and have up to 10 at a time. Vastly different to equine reproduction. Horses are relatively easy to reduce via aerial shooting, not pigs

‘Environmentalists’ and so called scientific ecologists have not thought this through.

For an interesting read google search ‘ The best Hollywood script ever – the brumby cull in New South Wales – Website | http://www.robertonfray.com’

There is nothing sudden about the damage horses have done over the years. NPWS have been trying to manage horses in KNP for a very long time but have been constantly thwarted by horse advocates. Pigs are easily shot from helicopters and if you do not believe me you should watch the dozens of You Tube videos that are posted. There has been little objection to the aerial culling of other invasive species but it seems the precious horse is in need of special treatment.

Other animals will not fill any vacuum caused by removing horses apart from those native animals prejudiced by their constant degradation of habitat. Pigs deer and horses have different diets and population rates are not affected by the increased or decreased presence of any of them.

Philip Creagh5:20 pm 15 Oct 24

Could I make it plain that I believe aerial culling is the only viable method for the control of horses, pigs and possibly deer in KNP. From my experience in New Zealand In the’70s and ‘80s aerial culling of deer rapidly teaches them to ‘flee’ to densely wooded country. Possibly horses will do the same over time.

In relation to shooting horses. I believe the calibre of rifle is inadequate. A .338 calibre with at least 250grain soft nose projectiles would be adequate. .338 is the largest calibre that can be used with an automatic rifle as far as I’m aware. The bullets used at Guy Fawkes were not ‘faulty’ – they were incorrect type and calibre. I would not be surprised if quite a few horses had a less than desirable demise.

I may be a retired Veterinarian, with over 50 years experience, however all my knowledge did not disappear when I retired!!

The point I am trying to make from literature and personal observation is that something will definitely fill the vacuum if the horses are removed ‘suddenly’ – especially north of the Snowy mountains highway. The fecundity of pigs is astonishing – I have seen this first hand in the Macquarie Marshes and surrounding farms.

Deer and horses have a very similar diet and pigs in the north have done a lot of damage to river and stream banks that horses are blamed for.

As I said I do not believe ecologists have factored what will fill the vacuum – something that doesn’t surprise me in the current state of the NPWS and Scientific Review Committee. Nowhere have I seen a contrary discussion on this issue.

An Ecologist11:44 am 17 Oct 24

Philip, don’t tell us your opinion of your expertise. Tell us your qualifications and experience. Experience has taught me that the statement “I have a fairly good knowledge of” is a warning that in fact the speaker may have little understanding.

And on what evidence do you make your claim that ‘the horse numbers have been exaggerated’? (The evidence indicating that the helicopter line transect counts from 2001 onward have UNDER-estimated the number of horses in Kosci is that: some areas with horses are not included in the counts; and the line transect method has often tended to underestimate).

Philip Creagh5:21 pm 17 Oct 24

Greetings Ecologist
This has been a civilized discussion and I won’t be informing you of all my qualifications. Other than to say I graduated in Veterinary Science from Sydney University, worked with wildlife in Africa and Canada for a short while. Obtained post graduate qualifications in Canada and UK. I have been able to follow my special interest in wildlife and fishery science since retiring from active work. So what are your qualifications?

You appear to be more interested in shouting down anyone who has an alternative opinion. You have not exactly made definitive scientific comments, sweeping generalisations seem your style.

I base my claim on querying the control, of horses within KNP on the following factors:
• A sceptical side of my career that has developed since I have seen the way data sets have been manipulated in the past. Particularly in the Grey Nurse Shark count of 2003/4
• Data manipulation is not unknown within all areas of science. However in Medicine/Veterinary Science and Dental Science you can be deregistered for doing so – think McBride, Erin and Wakefield. Fishery scientists and University scientists are just moved sideways, no real penalty involved
• Horse numbers. Counting any wild animal (including fishes) in large areas is a fraught science – surely you would agree with that? The variabilities that can occur are large and legion. There is often very little in the way of definitive statements that can be made.
• The methodology using transects + estimates has its own wide variabilities – if you don’t believe that then you are not very statistically minded.
• Your derogatory ad hominem comments do nothing to advance the discussion – I have made several comments about the ‘after effects’ and the functional way to kill horses. I agree with you that aerial shooting is the best method. You have brushed off any thought as to what will replace the horses – I have my opinion you have yours. You do not seem to regard pigs as a threat – I just hope you are not in control of deciding priorities within KNP.
• Pig control using poison would be unlikely within KNP. Used in NSW State Forests, unlikely in National Parks.

I’ve followed this argument about horses and the damage they do to the alpine reserves for many years now, and I can see that both sides have merit.

It seems that most of the comments are not about culling but how horses are culled, namely shot from aerial platforms.

As an ex-soldier having served at the pointy end of the spear, I know only too well the requirements of taking a life. As an ex-regional vermin shooter tasked to cull kangaroos and emus in outback WA, the wholesale industrialised slaughter of native animals for the benefit of one species and their introduced cattle and sheep clearly showed the lengths that governments go to to satisfy the noisy mob.

What’s done is done and cannot be undone, no matter how loud and shrill the outrage. However, before creating a pantheon of Minister Sharpe and her government, why not present her with a workable, sustainable, cost-effective removal program rather than aerial eradication? If total rehoming is not a feasible option, slaughter at a licensed abattoir will deliver one hundred per cent usage of the beast’s sacrifice, which at least offsets their demise.

The human factor introduced the brumbies and the deer to these areas. Surely, the same human factor should now remove them?

Marilyn Nuske1:17 pm 12 Oct 24

You are incorrect, Peter.
RSPCA prosecuted over more than one cruelly shot brumby, on grounds of gross cruelty, the Governor General subsequently imposed a ban on aerial culling brumbies which remained in place for over 20 years on grounds of the inherent gross cruelty. If farmers leave a few festering carcass in a paddock they are prosecuted. Brumbies are protected by Legislation. Get over it,
3,000 must be retained in over 4 retention zones, we are still waiting on NPWS to manage, not cruelly slaughter

The RSPCA recently admitted to a senate inquiry it had no experience investigating matters associated aerial shooting when it was approached about the aerial culling in Guy Fawkes. One horse was found wounded a week later and a plea was entered by NPWS on that basis. All other counts were dropped.

The thing about legislation, particularly flawed legislation, is that it can (and I suggest will) be changed. Rest easy with your number for now though. Cling tightly to it, for now. People such as you are constantly feeding lies just to protect a domestically abundant animal that has no right to be in the National Park. I have seen the damage first hand but I doubt you have. I don’t say pigs and deer and not also responsible. The difference is that you say horses do NO damage and blame pigs and deer for everything. I see the damage my own horses do in wet areas and that is only four. Catchment managements in Victoria are providing grants to farmers so they can fence off stream banks because of the damage hard hooved animals do. Horses are hard hooved and I have watched them collapse stream banks and pug wet areas.

Edwina, you have made a few mistakes in this article. Firstly, with regard to Guy Fawkes, there was only evidence of one horse not killed immediately and that was due to faulty ammunition. The so called ‘ban’ you mention was a kneejerk reaction by the government to media hype. Hype much the same as all the speculation in this article. Your second error is that Penny Sharpe did not state the cost of culling was $8.2 million. That is the cost of the entire management operation since the plan was put in affect and included trapping and rehoming operations.

Perhaps Edwina could follow up and ask Rocky Harvey how long the average chase time is when the brumby runners gallop after mobs. Mobs of horses run until they drop from exhaustion and then the young foals taken from the herd. So much hypocrisy. This is what he and his mates want to bring back to the park. Besides that there is no actual evidence of any horses being chased into trees. Purely speculation based on personal bias but that is OK for Edwina. Her personal bias has been clear for a long time.

And as for Ian Brown. Get over it. The smell will be gone in weeks but the damage horses and other invasive species have done to the park will take decades to repair. All this emotion for the love of an animal that is domestically abundant. Finally a government with enough nads to get the job done. Generations to come will thank Penny Sharpe.

patricia gardiner9:07 am 14 Oct 24

Your comments are a much needed reality check, Peter. Thank you.

Anton Hutchinson6:52 am 12 Oct 24

The whole campaign of aeriel culling was barbaric from the start. The suggestion that animals could be humanely killed was a bloody fantasy and the outcome is a disgrace. These poor horses, that are in the mountains because of human neglect have suffered multiple gun shots and died in excruciating pain.
I hope the people that approved this travesty suffer from the same and rot in hell!

I would love to hear about your suggestions on how to rid the park of thousands of hard hooved herd animals. Every other method tried could not keep up with the natural population growth. People, such as yourself, with their objections to any control methods over the years have cause many more thousands of horses to be shot.

Wishing for people to be shot is one step away from threatening to do it and I am surprised this media allowed such a violent comment to be published. You should be ashamed. There is no evidence any horse suffered beyond what is considered humane. Human neglect certainly caused this problem but you can’t bury your head in the sand and let the problem get worse.

Richard Casburn6:31 am 13 Oct 24

Iam not going to discuss the procedures of the culling or the politcs, but I wil say every animal that was shot, should have been removed by helicopter regardless of cost or time and buried.

Richard Casburn6:38 am 13 Oct 24

Iam not going to discuss the procedures of the culling or politcs, but I wil say every animal that was shot, should have been removed by helicopter regardless of the cost, time or difficulty and buried.

Richard Casburn6:41 am 13 Oct 24

Iam not going to discuss the procedures of the culling or politcs, but I will say every animal that was shot, should have been removed by helicopter regardless of the cost, time or difficulty and buried.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.