21 January 2026

Forestry Corporation hit with $60k penalty over alleged water pollution

| By Claire Sams
Join the conversation
3
Creek and wombat hole

The NSW EPA says there is an ongoing risk to downstream water quality in Mogo State Forest. Photo: Kim Treasure.

The Forestry Corporation NSW (FCNSW) has been handed a $60,000 penalty after being accused of polluting a Eurobodalla forest.

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has issued two penalty notices over what it said were ongoing concerns about water pollution in Mogo State Forest.

In February 2025, EPA officers carried out a series of inspections at a Dooga Creek crossing, which was used to move machinery between the eastern and western sides of a logging compartment within the forest.

The inspections revealed that the crossing was not constructed in accordance with established best practice, the EPA alleges, and sediment eroded from the crossing has moved into the creek.

NSW EPA director of operations Greg Sheehy said that despite being issued with a clean-up notice that required improvements, FCNSW had not completed the work.

“The crossing concerned is located in a designated Environmentally Significant Area and Dooga Creek supports important freshwater and coastal habitats,” Mr Sheehy said.

READ ALSO Man charged with murder over suspicious Nowra death

He also alleged there was an ongoing risk to water quality and aquatic habitat.

“While EPA inspections to date show the spread of sediment into the creek is limited, the ongoing failure to comply with the clean-up notice presents a clear and foreseeable risk of pollution as the crossing is progressively degraded,” he said.

“We expect FCNSW to implement and maintain the required erosion and sediment controls and will continue to monitor activities in Mogo State Forest until all practicable steps have been taken to prevent pollution of waters in this environmentally sensitive area.”

In addition to the penalty notices, the EPA has also issued an official caution relating to an alleged failure to comply with a clean‑up notice.

The EPA encourages the community to report potential water pollution incidents to the Environment Line on 131 555.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

3
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Philip Creagh9:53 am 22 Jan 26

The NSW EPA has a vendetta against NSW Forestry. If they were as assiduous in prosecuting marine pollution then our waterways may be a lot cleaner and near shore fish stocks would be healthier than they are now.

Extreme Green ‘conservation’ groups continuously denigrate the use of natural resources. This is wrong. Forestry and the commercial fishing industry provide regional jobs, hardwood timber for housing, power poles and locally fresh caught fish. Why is this continuously attacked by mainly city-centric groups and the Greens?

Within the Batemans Marine Park pollution, in all its forms, has been identified as the top 13 causes of damage to our marine environment. After 20 years there are still six sewage outfalls into the Batemans Marine Park, carrying many different toxins and endocrine disruptors that were not present 50 years ago. The NSW EPA does absolutely nothing about that. It appears this Government body merely serves as a client of the extreme green conservation groups.
Compared to the pollution that washed into the sea after our recent downpour, this incident in Mogo state forest seems incredibly miniscule in importance

As an aside, the management costs of NSW Forestry for public benefit is about 10% of the cost of managing NSW National Parks. How much will NSW State Forests cost to manage if the timber industry is removed? What will be the restrictions and laws that NSW National Parks will apply to our State Forests? Northern NSW is just starting to find that out.

cannedbeeria8:45 pm 21 Jan 26

Ho hum. Juist another flea bite piddling fine. “Cost of Business”. Pay up and move on.
To anyone that’s been living under a rock, this is not the first time the Forestry Commission has been caught out. Not by a long shot.
Do a search on NSW Forestry Commission penalties, and get set for a long read.
Here’s an example:
https://1earthmedia.com/a-pattern-not-a-slip-up-inside-nsw-forestry-corps-rising-fine-tally/

NSW forestry Hardwood division should be shut down, they don’t follow rules & regulations, they destroy our environment and they don’t make any money and the tax payer has to pay! 70million loss in the last four years. Why do we even allow this to continue?
They should just be concentrating on softwoods & plantations already in existence.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.