5 December 2024

Dalmeny Matters submits 1000-plus signature petition to Eurobodalla Shire Council

| Marion Williams
Join the conversation
11
Dalmeny Matters president Sally Christiansen with the petition she presented to Eurobodalla Shire Council on 3 December.

Dalmeny Matters president Sally Christiansen with the petition she presented to Eurobodalla Shire Council on 3 December. Photo: Supplied.

Community association Dalmeny Matters has outlined several concerns with the development of Dalmeny bushland and asked for early, meaningful consultation between the community, the owners of the three lots being developed, and Eurobodalla Shire Council.

Dalmeny Matters president Sally Christiansen submitted a petition with more than 1000 signatures to the council at the regular public access meeting on Tuesday (3 December).

The petition referenced the masterplan which the council had presented to the community and now sits with the owners to finalise.

Many of the concerns related to bushfire risk, protection of waterways, and preservation of habitat for threatened species. These arise from the fragmented nature of the development.

Ms Christiansen said there were three lots within the development site with three different owners. “This spreads the development across the site, rather than making a small perimeter to defend from the fire hazard,” she said.

READ ALSO Governor visits community-funded affordable housing in Bermagui, one of several in Bega Valley

Several creeks run through the area so there will be corridors of vegetation running through the site to protect the riparian zones. “There are sloped areas which will be too steep to develop so the development will likely be on the ridge lines, which brings a higher fire risk,” Ms Christiansen said.

She said the last time the community met with council staff, consultation with the RFS for the development had not occurred. “We would like to raise this issue again, now that the developers have been given the lead planning for the area,” she said.

The area is home to yellow-bellied gliders and glossy black cockatoos. Both are threatened species with large ranges that need large corridors between habitat areas, hollow nesting trees, and reliable water sources.

Assuming their habitat areas are preserved within the development, the fire risk must be managed. The community was told that there would likely be hazard-reduction burns every two to five years.

“This fire frequency is not compatible with the fire thresholds for these species. So, even if areas are put aside for them, it is unlikely they would survive in the area long term unless the footprint of the development could be somehow consolidated,” Ms Christiansen said.

Map of site

There are three lots within the development site owned by three different owners. Photo: Dalmeny Matters.

The community also wants clear answers about how Mummaga Lake will be protected, and the capacity of local sewage pumping stations and the treatment facility to cope with potentially 400 extra houses.

As it is, some areas are impacted by localised flooding and residents have complained to the council about uncleared silt traps in drainage reserves. Sewage overflows affect properties and Mummaga Lake during storms.

Ms Christiansen said the number one concern that locals had raised with the council since the development’s planning began was stormwater runoff impacting Mummaga Lake and Dalmeny Beach.

“These residents deserve a response as to how this large development may affect their properties into the future.”

Ms Christiansen said the development could lead to more than 400 additional houses. “It’s the equivalent of twice the numbers that Dalmeny has during peak holiday periods, year round.”

She said council’s draft housing strategy report that was tabled at the November meeting indicated that the shire didn’t lack single-dwelling houses. What it lacked was diversity of housing and affordable housing.

“We don’t believe this development at Dalmeny will address that, being zoned R2,” Ms Christiansen said. “Many members of the community were very disappointed, and felt misled, when the council confirmed the area was unsuitable for affordable housing provision.”

READ ALSO Hitting the sweet spot: How Gourmet Coast Trail is tempting tourists to the Far South Coast

She said there was much potential for infill development in Dalmeny, as well as the large site next to the Dalmeny IGA which would be developed as townhouses.

The community has requested they be consulted about access roads to the development area. Ms Christiansen said they had useful local knowledge about traffic volumes, dangerous areas, requirements for footpaths and bike path connectivity, and the routes that children took to school bus stops. Additionally, there were issues with traffic and parking in the Dalmeny business area.

Ms Christiansen said the community deserved clear information and a chance to have a say in the future planning of the area.

“We would like to raise specific concerns with the owners, now that they have been given the lead in the planning process. We would like to hear their vision for the area, to understand how risks will be mitigated, and whether there are plans to preserve areas for wildlife and recreation.

“If the three owners would be open to discussion about how to consolidate the footprint of the development, many of the serious challenges of this development could be improved.”

Join the conversation

11
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

NIMBY’s is all Dalmeny matters are while we have people sleeping on the streets these cashed up hippies from the big cities that have moved here don’t care about the local people This was zoned back 35 years ago by the then Mayor that did have a brain for the shire

Sirius Leeannoyed9:31 am 31 Dec 24

Wow Dave, you may need to educate yourself a wee bit.
As a born Narooma local who lives in Dal, I don’t know any hippies (perhaps you are thinking of Nimbin).
And it’s also pretty obvious, any houses here will be North of a million, and (we) are no where near jobs or infrastructure.
So completely useless to families or workers.
But don’t let your vehemence stop your pointless ranting.

cannedbeeria2:14 pm 03 Jan 25

If that area was approved/zoned “back 35 years ago”why was it not developed at the time? What sort of council lets developers buy up land and then not develop it? “Land banking anyone”? The developers everywhere buy up land so they can “save”it until prices go up. It’s been a hallmark of coastal land releases for decades. How many people do we know that buy two adjacent blocks, build on one and then sit on the other until prices rise….
If the laws regarding zoning have changed over the years, then those laws must be obeyed – by developers as much as anyone else. If the speed limit in my street is reduced, I can’t go on driving at the old limit. What may have been acceptable years ago may not be now. Ditto zoning and development legislation. In FORTY years, we have learned a lot about biodiversity and maintaining our precious landscapes. What my have been ok back then, is not acceptable now.
There should be a “covenant” on any land that says you build (and complete) within a practical timeframe. Don’t build, suffer the consequences.

Jenny Knowles6:03 pm 03 Jan 25

So do you want freebie houses paid for by taxpayers? It’s called a free market Sirius (or is it Pattie?) or would you prefer to live in Russia?

patricia gardiner5:48 pm 06 Dec 24

Zombie developments approved decades ago should undergo scrutiny of current development standards re environmental impact, fire and flood risks, infrastructure requirements and impact, etc etc.
Reported in The Beagle July 2021.
Justin Field, Member of the Legislative Council in the NSW Parliament
says, “The idea that a rezoning or development approval from 40 years ago, which was never acted on, should now just be given the green light with no new scrutiny is absurd.

The times have changed, those communities have changed, and our knowledge of climate change has grown. We need a planning system that can adapt and change to ensure development is appropriate in these sensitive coastal environments.

“There is just too much to lose if we get this wrong and the argument that there is a 20 or 30 year old approval just fails these communities and future generations.

Richard McLeod6:41 pm 10 Dec 24

Do you want to get rid of private property Pattie?

Sirius Leeannoyed9:41 am 31 Dec 24

RM.. Pretty sure, her comment is making sure DA’s from 30 years ago, from the age of bulldoze everything, being reviewed to meet modern and sustainable standards, doesn’t mention getting rid of private property..

Richard McLeod5:00 pm 05 Dec 24

This is private land and is zoned for residential development Our Shire needs housing. What do the dopey NIMBYs of Dalmeny want? Every time someone tries to build the much needed housing on the South Coast all the whingers and NIMBYs come out and get media oxygen.

Jenny Knowles4:55 pm 05 Dec 24

Silly and selfish NIMBYs unite! No to much needed housing. When will these people realise we have a housing crisis? The land is zoned residential, sold by the Council for housing and is now being readied for housing. Bring it on please.

Sirius Leeannoyed9:34 am 31 Dec 24

Yup.. bring on million dollar homes, nowhere near employment or support services.. not a clever plan.
Housing is needed.. but putting it in the boon docks. And making it only affordable as canberra weekenders isn’t a sensible plan.

Jenny Knowles2:30 pm 04 Jan 25

So Dalmeny is the “boon docks”. Do you know how much an average house costs to build including the land? Perhaps you think our teachers, police and nurses are only allowed to live in cheapo caravan parks? Sounds like you are a rather selfish nimby boomer. Back to Primary school Sirius.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.