20 October 2025

Batemans Bay residents' group wants council-owned land retained for community use, not developed

| By Marion Williams
Join the conversation
10
carpark and commercial area

The site of the former Batemans Bay Bowling Club. Photo: Eurobodalla Shire Council.

Proposals in the draft Batemans Bay Master Plan for potential high-rise development on the site of the old Batemans Bay Bowling Club have led to the formation of a group of residents.

Group convener Neil Gow said the land had been a community recreational area since 1918. A Eurobodalla Welcome Park Group has been formed to lobby Eurobodalla Shire Council to reconsider the site’s development.

“The history of this site should guide its future use, and that should be its retention by the community as an open space,” Mr Gow said. “It is surrounded by other key recreational areas, including the Mackay Park football facility and the Pavilion Aquatic and Arts Centre. Let’s keep the precinct for the enjoyment of the community.”

The group believes that the site of the old bowling club, which runs along Princes Highway and Vesper Street, would serve the public’s best interest if it became a beautiful community park, a true gateway feature to welcome visitors to the Natural Coast and provide recreational activities for all.

The site is bounded by the wetlands of McLeod’s Creek in the Clyde River estuary.

Mr Gow said the mangroves, salt marshes and swamp oak floodplain forest were of high conservation value and classed under NSW legislation as threatened and protected ecological communities. As community land, the site would blend into and help protect those wetlands, and allow Smoke Point and the Pavilion to be linked by a walking track with interpretive signage to explain both Aboriginal and European heritage.

READ ALSO Doing death differently: Coffin weaving and shroud making workshops in Bodalla

“Council should not sell this land, a community asset, to a private developer,” Mr Gow said. “This can be assured by council voting to change its function from operational to community use.

“Its retention as community land would overcome the central issue of the conflict of roles involved in commercial negotiations to date, which have dogged the council since the purchase of the site in 2016, its declaration as operational land, and more recently the discussions with potential buyers and developers.

“If council agrees to reclassify the land as community use, we will be asking them to undertake a community consultative process to develop a plan of management for this site.”

An artist's impression of a coastal development

An artist’s impression of five key Gateway and Landmark sites included in the draft Batemans Bay Master Plan. Photo: Eurobodalla Shire Council website.

In May, several residents spoke at a council public forum about the shortcomings of the draft Batemans Bay Master Plan.

In response to an eight-part question on notice by Councillor Anthony Mayne, council staff said that “as part of a general governance overview and due to recommendations included in the draft masterplan relating to the old bowling club site”, the council would commission a probity report.

Cr Mayne talked about the background of the attempted sale of council-owned land that had led the council to “put an indicator into the market of 70 metres [building height], that then went to 80 metres, and then by doing affordable housing it gets to 100 metres [building height]”.

“I am so pleased we have a probity report looking at this,” he said, noting “so many significant points that I think fall under governance and probity have been raised today.

“We need to give our community greater confidence in the process.”

READ ALSO Motor on to Classics at Cobargo to see vintage cars and trucks, plus preserved machinery and bikes

When Cr Mayne asked about the probity report and why it was needed in this instance, the council’s interim general manager Mark Ferguson said such reports were best practice and the probity report would look at many aspects, including the evidence underlying the plan, the community consultation process, and any gaps.

“In my experience, masterplans are always controversial,” Mr Ferguson said. “We do probity reviews to get better outcomes.”

In a statement, a council spokesperson said the Welcome Park group had met with the council’s general manager and put its ideas forward.

“No decisions have been made, and all views will be considered with the finalisation of the masterplan,” the spokesperson said.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

10
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

“…if building heights were drastically lowered it could jeopardise the view of Batemans Bay as the shire’s regional city and would have implications elsewhere in the shire”…Whaat?! So, kindly DO PROVIDE IRREFUTABLE PROOF of what is/are the general, non-BB populations’ anticipation and perception of BB as a desirable destination and liveable location, together with accurate, quantified analysis of their expectations, including those with intention to permanently relocate! If one makes such a specific claim, one needs – is required – to be able to substantiate with fact, not float the statement expecting universal acceptance. It appears demonstrably clear that council and officers complicitly ecpect majority blind or submissive acceptance from the outset for a cloud-thought ‘inspriation’ out of left field from people well-experienced in executing budgetary-management defecit-failures and strategies the envy of no other councils. Perhaps overdue for the regeneration and total renewal, viz a vis: new council and management. One reiterates the experience of having, in all sincerity and respectfully, having emailed ‘representative’ councillor for 0 response.

Richard McLeod12:55 pm 28 Oct 25

Keep going Council. Please ignore the insufferable backward looking numbskulls. Super sleuth/retired kindy teacher provides absolutely nothing to the complicated challenges ahead.

patricia gardiner7:17 pm 25 Oct 25

Personal correspondence from ‘Confidential’ Cath(GM) 7th Sept 2020 advises:

Following is an excerpt from the FAQ’s document published on Council’s website:
‘Where will money come from for the facility’s[PAV] operation and maintenance?
The funding will come from within the existing Council budget.
Other potential income streams such as the sale/lease of ………. the former Bowling Club site are subject to review and approval through Council.’

“This means that should Council determine to lease or sell the …….. former Bowling Club site, the Council would also need to approve the use of those funds for the operation and maintenance of the Batemans Bay Regional Aquatic, Arts and Leisure Centre.

Proceeds from the sale of Council owned land are restricted into Council’s real estate disposal fund to be used for COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT.”.

patricia gardiner2:23 pm 22 Oct 25

Council resolved on 12 JULY 2016 THAT:
1. Lots 282, 283 and 299 DP 755902 and Lot 304 DP 257116 Batemans Bay be classified as
operational land.
2. Council assures the community that they will not lose tenure over any of the four titles of
Bowling Club land, without comprehensive and transparent community engagement.

There is also a draft Probity Plan for the sale of the Bowlo site attached to the 14 Feb 2023 Council Meeting agenda.

Trish Hellier8:37 pm 21 Oct 25

I understand where Neil is coming from, there are many, many people who will never forget the disappointment when it was realised the Batemans Bay Bowl Club building was not going to be for Community use.

In June 2016 Council conducted an “open day” at the Batemans Bay Bowling Club – whilst the older section of the club needed attention the Clubs Auditorium was in great condition. As we left the building we were told that “in the next few years the swimming pool would be gone, and possibly Putt, Putt, Golf and within time the Bowling Club itself would be gone”. This ofcourse was before it had gone out to “Community Consultation”!!!

Council went through the usual “Community Consultation” – the ticking of the boxes!!!

Ofcourse that is now “all history”!!!

We all realise the financial situation of the Aquatic Centre – realistically there is a lot of issues that need consideration what do the rate payers of this shire want to see – are they prepared to accept another Special Rate Variation? are they prepared to see the site sold to a developer which could offset the cost of the Aquatic Centre? are they prepared to see the Multi Story Apartments on the old Bowling Club site?

Lets hope that things have been learnt from the many mistakes from the past, that includes the design of the Village Shopping Centre – freezing cold in winter and roasting hot in summer!!! Trish Hellier

Really!
According to the Mayor and councillors the results of the master plan consultation process are in, 70/30% N&P or 70/30% P&N depending on the means used to submit the feedback, and of course, the strategic analysis technique applied internally. So why is there zero accountability and transparency from Council now to publicly deliver the results?

Until the results of the probity review, and master plan consultation report are released, the community will continue the debate and seek affirmation and reassurance from council staff to ensure their views were heard and actioned accordingly.

As each month passes however, it is becoming increasingly clear that perhaps the master plan is at a stalemate and blocked by bureaucracy, like the housing strategy, and the traffic flow problems in Moruya were; no deliverables ever emerged following lengthy community consultation and feedback on those two projects either. Therefore, the ongoing master plan rhetoric will continue and we will continue to hear about the formation of new committees popping up everywhere just to keep the narrative going, which really is unnecessary and a total waste of community and public resource time.
There is a simple solution to end this repetitive debate we all keep reading about, and restore trust in the local government system to do the right thing by the people they serve and represent….. Communicate Council, Pleaseeee!!

patricia gardiner3:48 pm 20 Oct 25

Perhaps the community could get the 50m heated pool that they always wanted prior to ESC deciding to build a $70m white elephant.

cannedbeeria10:52 pm 23 Oct 25

…And getting thrown out for their trouble. (There’s a message in there somewhere..)

Richard McLeod3:42 pm 20 Oct 25

Oh dear. As if the Pav financial disaster is not enough. Looks like retired Bay crazies want yet another dopey spend up on ratepayer and taxpayer dollars. Mr Gow needs to think about some very simple but often overlooked questions. Who will eventually pay, who will eventually operate and who will forever maintain? Such questions are sadly beyond the grasp of the local nutters.

Make sure the waste of time and money probity report examines any matters already forwarded to ICAC. That should be very interesting and illuminating.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.