23 March 2021

Anzac Hall, dozens of trees to go in War Memorial redevelopment's 'early works'

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
3
Artist's impression of the redeveloped Australian War Memorial.

An artist’s impression of the redeveloped Australian War Memorial, showing the new Southern Entrance and Parade Ground. Image: Australian War Memorial.

The Australian War Memorial has been accused of trying to sneak through fundamental elements of its controversial $500 million redevelopment by labelling them as ‘early works’.

It has submitted a works application prepared by Knight Frank to the National Capital Authority (NCA) that includes the demolition of the award-winning Anzac Hall, the ripping up of the parade ground and the clearing of dozens of trees.

Heritage Guardians spokesperson Dr David Stephens said the process reeks of subterfuge and the War Memorial is encouraging the NCA to indulge in ‘salami slicing’, approving ‘early works’ of such importance that it will be impossible for the NCA not to approve the whole project when the time comes.

“If you can’t knock over Anzac Hall the whole project falls in a heap,” said Dr Stephens.

He said the NCA should consider all elements of the project together, not separately.

“It’s almost certain the project will be agreed to, but at least make a pretence of treating the project seriously and not trying to rush it through in this secretive way.”

Plan of proposed early works in the Australian War memorial redevelopment.

Proposed early works in the Australian War Memorial redevelopment. Image: Knight Frank.

Dr Stephens said the War Memorial had treated each stage of the approvals process as window dressing.

“There’s still an air of arrogance and inevitability coming from the Memorial,” he said.

“The Memorial has always relied on the Anzac cloak to shield it from the sort of accountability other public institutions are used to.”

Dr Stephens said public notice of proposals had been scant in detail, but people wanting to know more were then swamped with information.

“The Memorial is very good at every approval stage producing a mountain of documents inadequately indexed and hellishly difficult for the average person to find their way through,” he said.

The new works application – flagged previously to Heritage Guardians as just including hoardings, service relocations and excavation – details the removal of at least 65 trees, some mature eucalypts such as those framing the Memorial entrance; the demolition of Anzac Hall and the link to the main building; and the excavation of the Parade Ground to reconfigure the Southern Entrance, which will have street level entrances.

The stonework of the Main Entry stair and plinths, and the heritage retaining wall will be removed and stored for reinstatement.

Before and after maps of Southern Entrance at Australian War Memorial.

Before and after – how the Southern Entrance will change at the Australian War Memorial. Image: Knight Frank.

There will also be a new roundabout to Poppy’s Cafe carpark, as well as works associated with the Bean Building extension.

Calling the tree removal wanton vandalism, Dr Stephens said there were also a number of trees assessed in 2019 and it is unclear how many of these might also be under threat.

He said the Southern Entrance excavation is massive and would fundamentally change the look of the Memorial, and could not possibly be considered an ‘early work’.

The Memorial argues the redesigned Southern Entrance will make the institution more accessible for the elderly and people with a disability.

The Parliamentary Works Committee and the Department of Agriculture, Water and Environment, through the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act process, have ticked off the redevelopment, which will expand the Memorial’s size and enable it to tell the stories of more contemporary military and peacekeeping missions.

The proposed new two-storey Anzac Hall and glazed link will also allow it to display more military hardware such as planes, helicopters and armoured vehicles.

But the project has spurred opposition from former Memorial directors and staff, the Australian Institute of Architects, and a broad range of prominent Australians concerned at the cost, the loss of Anzac Hall, and the Memorial’s direction.

Most of the submissions to the parliamentary inquiry were against the proposal.

Comment on this application can be made until 30 April.

Original Article published by Ian Bushnell on The RiotACT.

Join the conversation

3
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Ronda Conway Aspendale Victoria 319511:25 am 29 Apr 21

I wish to lodge my strong objection to the proposed wanton destruction of Anzac Hall and the eucalypts…this so-called re-development is totally unnecessary.

Your response is requested.

Virginia West12:45 pm 23 Apr 21

dear Gum Trees of The War Memorial. You who witnessed decades of ANZACS days. How will the Kookaburras & Magpies greet the Dawn Services without you? What will the young of the future think of a bare facade that can be ripped down again in 20 years? A gum tree can live longer & honour any of the Wars it is commerating.

Coastal Visitor1:38 pm 29 Mar 21

I wonder how long it will be before they build stunning, luxury executive apartment blocks on the site?

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.