30 May 2025

Aerial shooting to resume in Kosciuszko despite wild horse population plunge

| By Edwina Mason
Join the conversation
24
wild horses

The aerial shooting cull of Kosciuszko National Park’s wild horses will resume next month. Photo: Supplied.

The NSW Government will resume aerial shooting of wild horses in Kosciuszko National Park in June, sparking renewed controversy and criticism just months after NSW Environment Minister Penny Sharpe appeared to suggest the controversial control method was being phased out.

The decision follows the release of updated population figures by the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) last week, which estimated that between 1579 and 5639 horses remain in the park – a significant drop from the 2023 estimated average of 17,393.

The reduction moves the population closer to the legislated target of 3000 horses by 30 June 2027, as mandated by the Kosciuszko Wild Horse Heritage Act 2018.

At a budget estimates hearing on 3 March, Minister Sharpe praised the success of the wild horse culling program and downplayed the likelihood of further aerial culling.

“Aerial shooting is less likely now,” she said. “We’re not ceasing it, but I think it will not need to be used, particularly in the retention areas, because the program has been so successful to date.”

Around 32 per cent of KNP has been designated as retention areas — zones where wild horse herds can remain in recognition of their cultural heritage value.

These areas are primarily located in the southern, northern and eastern sections of the park.

READ ALSO Wild horse numbers drop in Kosciuszko, sparking praise and pushback

This week, however, Ms Sharpe’s department confirmed aerial shooting will resume in June for the control of all feral species, including deer and pigs, and will be limited to areas outside designated horse retention zones.

However it said there was an obligation under the KNP wild horse heritage management plan to remove all horses from wild horse removal and prevention management areas by 30 June 2027.

“All control methods will continue to be used in these areas,” it said.

Large parts of northern and central KNP will be closed to the public during the 10-30 June operation, including remote wilderness zones and sections of the Australian Alps Walking Track, the Hume and Hovell Track and the National Trail.

The move has triggered a backlash from animal welfare advocates and brumby supporters, who accuse the government of mixed messaging.

“This is a betrayal of trust,” said Leisa Caldwell, a former member of the KNP Wild Horse Community Advisory Panel. “The minister indicated very clearly that aerial shooting was being wound back. Now we’re facing another round of helicopter gunships.”

Ms Caldwell also disputes the updated NPWS population figures, citing an independent AI analysis of raw survey data that showed only 1365 horses were physically sighted.

“The numbers being officially quoted are statistical projections, not headcounts,” she said. “We shouldn’t be authorising lethal operations on what is essentially a modelling assumption.”

She also raised concerns about the impact of the Snowy 2.0 hydroelectric scheme on the remaining wild horse heritage herds.

“That number doesn’t justify this level of lethal response,” she said. “We’ve said time and time again any remaining heritage mobs – like the Kiandra horses – are being pushed out of their retention areas by the Snowy 2.0 construction and as a result of jackhammers and bulldozers, they’ll also be wiped out.

“I think the minister has total extermination of the horses in mind,” she added, “and ironically no one is talking about the ecological damage Snowy 2.0 is doing when it’s tearing the park apart.”

Minister Sharpe has rejected claims of inconsistency, stating that aerial culling remains a necessary option in remote regions where non-lethal methods are impractical.

She also reiterated that a reproductive control trial — using one-shot contraceptive vaccines such as the oocyte growth factor (OGF) — is under development.

“I had a discussion with staff at Kosciuszko about preparing for a reproductive control trial,” she told parliament this week. “The NPWS is actively assessing all available tools.”

The OGF vaccine, trialled successfully in the United States, has been promoted by Animal Justice Party MLC Emma Hurst as a humane alternative to mass killing.

“We now have tools that could make a real difference — but we need the political will to use them,” Ms Hurst said. “Reverting to aerial shooting before these trials even begin sends a contradictory and deeply troubling message.”

Environmental groups, meanwhile, have welcomed the return of aerial culling, arguing that feral horses are inflicting lasting damage on endangered ecosystems and species, including alpine peatlands, wetlands and native fauna.

Professor Jamie Pittock, an environmental policy expert at the Australian National University, said the impact of horses on sensitive waterways and vegetation remained “devastating”.

“Where horses have been removed, the land is starting to heal. Where they remain, erosion, trampling, and water pollution are still occurring.

“Kosciuszko is home to species like the northern corroboree frog and alpine she-oak skink, and every delay in horse control puts them more at risk,” he said.

READ ALSO NSW Government rejects calls to repeal brumby protection law despite public petition

Aerial culling was banned in NSW in 2000 due to welfare concerns, but reinstated under strict protocols in 2023.

These include adherence to nationally-endorsed animal welfare standards and oversight by an independent panel.

Under the 2021 wild horse management plan, horse numbers must be reduced to 3000 and confined to seven designated retention zones, such as Nungar Plain, Cooleman Plain and Boggy/Kiandra Plains — the latter of which now overlaps with Snowy 2.0 operations.

As helicopters prepare to return to the skies over Kosciuszko, the debate shows no signs of slowing — balancing biodiversity protection against heritage values, ethics and public trust.

“We’re not saying ‘do nothing,’” Leisa Caldwell said. “We’re saying ‘do better’. If fertility control is finally on the table, then why are we still leading with bullets?”

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

24
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Philip Creagh11:39 am 05 Jun 25

Minister Sharp claims the aerial shooting has been successful. However the numbers always seem a little rubbery.

In 2023 the official estimate, with a 95% confidence, was 18,000, with a range from 13,000 to 22,500. The official 2024 figure, post cull, varied from 2,000 to 5,500. Allegedly the number of horses culled by aerial shooting was 6,000. Does anyone see any disparity in these numbers?

The proponents of no feral horses implicitly believe anything that demonises the presence of horses in KNP.

1. Many claims are made that horses are unsuitable in KNP because Australia ‘evolved without horses’. That is rubbish. Horses were introduced into the Americas with the Spanish in the 1500’s, about 200 years before Australia. Surely soil types don’t differ that much between continents (no they don’t!!)

2. After 30 years of looking at ‘official’ claims by the NSW Government about any issue involving the environment there is much misinformation and downright ‘altering’ figures to suit their cause. For example the Grey Nurse shark fiasco.

3. There has been no study on the actual effects of horses on the various animals described by the Invasive Species Council (an environmental NGO). There is evidence of cosmetic damage by horses north of the Snowy Mountains Highway, but I have yet to see a peer reviewed study of any actual harm, other than attribution.

4. In the first couple of weeks in May I fished the Thredbo River and the rivers and streams around Kiandra. Over the past 30 years the Sambar deer have been moving north from Victora, they are a very big problem on the Thredbo, I have many photos of their effects – far worse than horses on the plains. To my eyes the damage in the Kiandra/Tantangra area was no better or worse than in years gone by. There has been little effort to remove deer of pigs in the Thredbo valley, all the way to the Victorian border.

Philip Creagh1:53 pm 05 Jun 25

5. The effect of removing this number of horses will cause an ecological re-balance. Nature hates a vacuum and I am extremely concerned this will cause a dramatic increase in pig damage. Horses will produce less than 1 foal per year, feral pigs can have up to 12 per year. Pigs can also be a carrier of diseases that would be disastrous to Australia

6. Pigs cause extensive damage on creeks and surrounds looking for food, they almost ‘plough’ the ground. On Tantangra Creek two years ago there was a section about 1 acre in size that was completely destroyed by pigs. Prof. Lintermans study of stocky galaxia in that creek looked purely at the effect of horses without identifying any other threat. He didn’t actually identify whether horses had actually caused their decline, other than the noted cosmetic creek damage.

Rebecca Isbister3:39 am 12 Jun 25

I concur that substantial evidence/studies are needed. It’s a shame the government is taking this action based on “fear”. Akni to point one, the way a horse’s hoove is shaped means that as they travel, they help to aerate soil which is a BENEFIT for native species.

Josephine Hogg7:00 am 04 Jun 25

Ancient Life forms millions of years evolving and 100’s of years old, are being destroyed by horses in the Bush. Which is more precious – these Life Forms or introduced horses that live a few years?

patricia gardiner5:22 pm 03 Jun 25

I am curious to know how many of the feral horse advocates support the cruelty/torment inflicted on animals at rodeos – bull riding, bronc riding & calf roping.
Do they attend to, participate or watch for enjoyment, while horses etc are being tormented and maltreated in order to make them react?

Rebecca Isbister3:36 am 12 Jun 25

Not at all do I support this. Also, unrelated!

Mans best achievements to wipe out species in our planet. What about the national parks decimation if thousands of hectares by burning it ,who is more damaging now?
Leave the poor animals to live we have no right to kill if not to eat them. Look at what we are doing to the planet and all of its inhabitants, we will be extinct too one day and it’s by our own hands!

Coleen Chase4:03 pm 31 May 25

This is cruel and unconscionable slaughter of our fellow wild ones and I urge all Australians to speak up against this violence. As Gandhi said: “the greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” And I strongly believe that it’s time we all realize that when we destroy our wild ones we are destroying our very souls. It is a dark soul indeed that can agree to slaughter these magnificent beings who have served mankind throughout the ages.

Stop The Obviously Cruel Brumby Cull12:43 pm 03 Jun 25

Well said Coleen – its time we cut through the Slaughterers crap used to perpetuate abhorrent animal cruelty. Aerial Shooting and 1080 Poisons are just the start of how they call Animals “Pests” to justify unjustifiable cruelty.

“Ms Caldwell also disputes the updated NPWS population figures, citing an independent AI analysis of raw survey data that showed only 1365 horses were physically sighted.”

Lets talk about this alleged independent Artificial Intelligence count. Ms Caldwell misrepresents the facts yet again. I have read the study. The AI counted thousands more horses but these were removed from the count by people who manually verified every AI result. The same people who were paying for the alleged independent count. Were the numbers just too high? Was the AI wrong? I would appear the AI was only 33% accurate at best. Ms Caldwell doesn’t tell you that but is happy to discount the official count that was conducted by experienced people with a tested method. Claire Galea and Peter Cochran stated publicly (prior to the alleged independent count) there were less than 1000 horses in the entire park but Galea’s own count found 1365 horses in a small section of the park. So if we are not to believe the numbers in the official count why should we believe any number provided by those who are clearly agenda biased?

What is this gibberish you are speaking of?
I personally had AI review the raw data received from the NPWS most recently released Survey count of Nov 2024.
Its Nothing to do with any other surveys at all.
That NPWS raw data reveals each individual horse that was seen and physically counted and also details transects, weather, landscape as well as shows which side of the helicopter the counter was sitting.
This AI review that i had done stated that in Oct/November 2024 only 1365 horses were actually seen and counted in the whole KNP.
Then NPWS added the 2 different survey methodologies which are both based on assumption then extrapolated the assumed estimates to be
2793 and the other 3885.
FYI previous surveys have never actually physically seen or counted more than 3200 horses during their surveys but the modelling assumes that they don’t see up to 85%.

Marilyn, why do you keep saying Pestsmart is the National Regulator for aerial shooting? It is a private company that has no regulatory powers. It engages in aerial culling and has written a set of SOP’s that have been adopted and modified by government agencies. It seems somewhat ironic that a person such as you continually quotes from manuals written by someone who engages in shooting pests for a living.

As for Caldwell’s comments in the article. Reclaim Kosci has been quite outspoken about Snowy 2 and its effect on the environment. Plenty of environmentalists are complaining about it. The horses are not being pushed out of retention areas because of Snowy 2. Horses wander but they also get quite accustomed to day to day incursions. I recall a photo of a helicopter searching for the photographer who went missing and it was hovering low over a mob of horses grazing happily. None seemed bothered.

Are you an expert in wild horse behaviour? Clearly you have very little experience or knowledge on this subject.

patricia gardiner6:22 pm 30 May 25

I am much pleased that feral animal control continues, particularly now that it also includes pigs and deer.
Numbers of feral animals must be reduced as much as possible. The more that are eliminated, the greater the survival rate of our native species – after all, that is what National Parks are for. They are not for protecting feral horses.

It is pleasing Patricia but just for clarity pigs, deer, goats, foxes and other feral pests have been subjected to control methods including shooting (aerial and ground) by NPWS for many years. Horses have only recently been added to the list. The lines are clear. There are retention areas and exclusion areas for horses as a result of the management plan. If horses cross the line they are fair game. Marilyn Nuske and her friends are seeking to blur that line to allow horses some room to move into exclusion areas without being subjected to control. Might as well just give the whole park back to them. The management plan provides for a maximum number of horses to be retained but it does not provide a minimum which is where Nuske and her lot get confused. Horses will not be moved to retention areas to keep the number at 3000.

patricia gardiner5:05 pm 03 Jun 25

Hi Peter. I am very much aware of the feral animal control work conducted by NPs. My partner and I have worked with Parks on feral pig control in our area, and locals are very supportive.
Protection of any feral animal is absurd.

Jenny Knowles10:35 am 04 Jun 25

The locals are not supportive in fact. They worry about trespass and snooping.

patricia gardiner12:42 pm 04 Jun 25

Hi Jen. I suggest you check with residents who contacted us to set up cage traps(provided by Parks & LLS) on their properties when they spotted pig activity.
When the pigs were trapped they informed us so we could shoot them and dispose of the carcasses. Other landholders with firearm licenses dispatched their own.
NP and LLS also provided grain as bait.
You shouldn’t tell porkies, Jen.

Jenny Knowles9:20 am 05 Jun 25

I hope you enjoyed shooting the poor defenceless and intelligent creatures. What locals and everyone else think is valid.

Marilyn Nuske3:23 pm 30 May 25

Quoting from today’s article : About Regional. “These include adherence to nationally-endorsed animal welfare standards and oversight by an independent panel.”
Pestsmart (the National regulator) does not support actions taken by NPWS of shooting in remote areas, from helicopters or in foaling season, it is assumed NPWS have claimed adherence.
The NPWS SOP’s were devised by NPWS to avoid prevention of cruelty laws, with instructions like “kill the foals first”, and with shooting with up to 15 bullets after comparatively long aerial chase, the aerial shooting “cannot be humane” (Expert Vet Dr Andrea Harvey)

Stop The Obviously Cruel Brumby Cull11:09 am 30 May 25

So they (Sharpe/ALP, Fleming/Parks, Cox & Swain & Gough & Groom/Invasive Species Council, aided by Coleman/RSPCA) exaggerated (got it totally wrong as we have always said) population numbers by 8,000 > 10,000 so as to cruelly slaughter from the air, and yet their own recent Count PROVES that the earlier estimations were way out, so they use much the same method again, shop around for a helpful Peer Review to cover over the gross over-slaughtering/animal cruelty, and now want to keep at the abhorrent cruelty based largely on multiple lies and deceit. Disgusting Illegitimate Animal Cruelty by all of the above that they now want to keep on doing.

This article refers to the OGF vaccine being “trialled successfully in the United States”. The only published study I can find on this says that of 15 treated mares, only 2 remained infertile for two years. Of the remaining treated mares “67% (10/15) became pregnant within 60 d while 20% (3/15) became pregnant much later (180–300 d)”. So, within a year, 87% of the treated mares became pregnant. (JE Bruemmer. 138 Immunization against oocyte growth factors in feral mares, May 2023, available online). Does the writer of the article know of more recent studies that justify the word ‘successfully’?

Stop The Obviously Cruel Brumby Cull11:17 am 30 May 25

While you are at asking questions of others Ms Groom, can you in your role as the main Invasive Species Council signature organiser/gatherer at Shopping Centres and the like, to remove/kill every last Brumby in the KNP, please offer up a single image of a dead or injured Corroboree Frog or Broad Tooth Rat that was caused by a Wild Horse/Brumby ?

Stop The Obviously Cruel Brumby Cull12:41 pm 03 Jun 25

Again – NO PROOF when asked for it !

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.