16 December 2025

Immediate gun law reforms promised in the wake of Bondi tragedy

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
8
Seized firearm

Federal, state and territory governments are ready to move on firearms reform. Photo: ACT Policing.

Anthony Albanese says he’s ready for the fight and will change Australia’s gun ownership laws no matter what the gun lobby says.

The Prime Minister has made gun law reform his number one priority in the wake of the Bondi Beach mass shootings on Sunday (14 December).

He convened the National Cabinet on Monday with that item placed firmly at the top of the agenda.

State and territory leaders have agreed with the Prime Minister that “strong, decisive and focused action was needed on gun law reform as an immediate action” and that includes renegotiating the National Firearms Agreement.

That agreement was first established after the 1996 Port Arthur tragedy, but with gun ownership in Australia once more rapidly on the rise, it needs strengthening.

Police Ministers and Attorneys-General across all jurisdictions are now being commissioned to “develop options” on accelerating work on a number of gun-ownership issues.

These include fast-tracking the National Firearms Register; beefing up the use of criminal intelligence in firearms licensing; limiting the number of firearms to be held by any one individual; limiting open-ended firearms licensing; and making Australian citizenship a condition of holding a firearm licence.

READ ALSO How underwater microphones are revealing a changing whale migration

“I am absolutely ready for the fight,” Mr Albanese said on Tuesday morning (16 December).

“These are common sense changes that we discussed yesterday.”

The ACT Government strongly endorses the agreed outcomes of the National Cabinet, with Chief Minister Andrew Barr saying he recognises that urgent action is needed on gun law reform.

“Work already underway in the ACT includes reviewing existing registry systems and processes, exploring technology options and assessing ACT firearms legislation to identify the changes needed to support the new digital registry,” Mr Barr said.

“This will include reforms relating to privately manufactured and 3D-printed firearms, permit-to-acquire arrangements and suitability criteria for firearms licences and other authorisations.

“I have commissioned the Attorney-General and the Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Services to progress this important work.”

NSW Premier Chris Minns and West Australian Premier Roger Cook will lead and coordinate the reform work across jurisdictions.

As an immediate priority, the Federal Government will start work on potential further Customs restrictions of firearms and other weapons type importations, including 3D printing, novel technology and firearms equipment that can hold large amounts of ammunition.

Mr Minns said he was prepared to recall the NSW State Parliament if necessary in order to pass urgent gun law changes in his state.

“We need to make sure the firearms legislation in NSW is fit for purpose,” he said.

“That does mean restricting firearms for the general public… not everybody needs these weapons of mass destruction.

“You don’t need them on NSW streets. So we’ll be looking at change.”

READ ALSO Harvest Riverina Festival to return in 2026 for bigger and better second year

The National Firearms Register is currently not scheduled for implementation until 2028, but work will now be brought forward to get all state and territory registers (some of which are still paper-based) coordinated across jurisdictions.

Speaking on ABC radio, Australian Federal Police Association president Alex Caruana said delays in getting the national register in operation have been two-fold.

“There is a little bit of ego and a little bit of ‘my state is better’ and ‘my car is faster’ and ‘we don’t want another system’ from the states,” he said.

“The other point is that the [Federal] Attorney-General at the time [the process for an NFR was started in 2024] … needed to come out deliberately and more firmly to say to the states ‘I’m not asking you to do this, I’m telling you to do this and I don’t care whose car is faster… which system works better… this is the system that everybody is going to have’.”

Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley is not yet fully embracing the need for further gun reform, insisting the priority should be adopting all the recommendations of Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Jillian Segal’s report.

“We will examine in a sensible, proportionate way what has come out of the National Cabinet and it’s an agreement to have a plan to look at certain things, but it’s not going to take the action we need on the issue we need, which is combating antisemitism,” Ms Ley said.

“The work has been done by Jillian, and it needs to be implemented. And it’s across government and society. And where is it? That’s the question for the Prime Minister today.”

Greens leader Larissa Waters welcomed the National Cabinet’s indication to move on gun laws and said her party would work with federal, state and territory parliaments to pass legislation to tighten gun ownership.

“This moment is beyond politics,” Senator Waters said.

“This is not America and we must work both to eradicate antisemitism and racism and to reduce unnecessary guns in our community”

Original Article published by Chris Johnson on Region Canberra.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

8
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Racoon head Shazza10:30 am 19 Dec 25

As usual the useless politicians miss the point and the issue.

Philip Creagh2:12 pm 17 Dec 25

Unbelievable, absolutely unbelievable. Following the tragedy at Bondi where one of the two terrorists have been shown to have come under ASIO interest and where both have been shown to have gone to the Philippines for weapons training that Albanese and Minns immediately think that ‘sweeping gun reform’ is the solution to a problem that doesn’t exist.

Minns was reported as saying ‘who needs to own these weapons of mass destruction?’ ‘Mass destruction???’ what an incredibly dullard statement.

Firearm ownership, whether for farm use, recreational hunting, target shooting or collecting has been vilified over the years for political gain. Especially by the left leaning media such as the Guardian, Sydney Morning herald and politicians from mainly the Greens side of the ledger. In NSW gun ownership is strictly controlled compared to the ‘60s when I first started using rifles and shotguns.

With the idea that Australia has to become a ‘proud multicultural society’ with a huge immigration intake it’s no surprise that Sydney has various areas that have become enclaves for various religious and societal groups. The majority of Australians and new Australians are just interested in getting on with life, but these tragic episodes are destined to become a fact of life for our country whether we like it or not.

Albanese and Minns have rightly come under criticism for their knee jerk reaction

cannedbeeria3:51 pm 18 Dec 25

The deliberate muder of innocent people, including children, using these weapons classifies them a weapons of mass destrcution in my book!
The victims were enjoying their religeous celebrations in a very Australian way.

And as for “immigration” even Sussan Ley has abandoned her push to make immigration an electroral issue, as a mark of respect.

cannedbeeria3:54 pm 18 Dec 25

“Albanese and Minns have rightly come under criticism for their knee jerk reaction””
In much the same way as John Howard did after the Port Arthur massacre…

Comparing Pt Arthur and Bondi is rather folly. Martin Bryant is a nut case and these guys are radicalised terrorists with a fair bit more between the ears. Taking more guns off the streets is a token gesture by Government at best. A better idea in my view would be to have gun licences renewable with medical checks like I have to for commercial drivers licence. Restricting the number of licenced weapons from 6 to 4 – that’s still going to be window dressing at best. Having to hold citizenship – worthwhile giving it a try. National Gun Register – now what a novel idea so law enforcement know in an instant by phones and radios on their way to a shout out who has what, and how much ammo they’ve purchased recently etc I wonder do any of the States & Territories have an electronic gun register – better than finding out before arrival at scene if your Glock is fit for purpose. I doubt this dreadful situation is going to be over anytime soon – it’s a matter of where and when. I pray that I’m wrong. Hugs to my Jewish family and friends.

Jenny Knowles12:59 pm 17 Dec 25

So critical that key local know it alls express their agreement to what is a sad diversion exercise from our PM and the Premier for Sydney. It is also important to tighten the illegal and cruel trapping of animals undertaken by numpties as well.

patricia gardiner7:21 pm 16 Dec 25

Although I agree with tightening gun laws, I’m afraid I cannot see how such a move would put an end to mass shootings.
The Bondi massacre is the result of cultural fanaticism., fueled by the slaughter of over 70,000 Palestinians by the Israeli government.
People express their amazement that one of the shooters had 6 registered firearms, yet in the Eurobodalla Shire one licensed owner has 106 firearms and another has 73. Neither of them are collectors or dealers.

cannedbeeria5:32 pm 22 Dec 25

If the gun register (that was supposed to be implemented as a result of the Port Arthur shootings) had been in operation, a very simple database search would have uncovered that an ASIO person of interest has the same surname as a registered fiream owner, in possession of six powerful guns. If ASIO had that tool in it’s armory I would imagine that search would be very early in their investigation. Way before the shootings took place. Way before the person of interest was allowed to fly to the Philipines – for any reason. The fact that he went with his father (the “registered owner of six firearms)”, would have raised the alarm.
To me, the fact that he was a person of interest, added to the fact he has the same surname as the owner of the weapons, and has been seen (he WAS a person of interest) in his company, would have prompted an investigation.
IF the guns were obtained legally (the father was a registered firearm owner) they WOULD have been on the register. It SHOULD haver been implemented almost 30 years ago. The father came to Australia 27 years ago. The gun’s history would have been on the register. Each sale would trigger that weapon’s file being updated on the register.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.