15 October 2025

Draft Batemans Bay Master Plan comes under fire

| By Marion Williams
Join the conversation
8
Eurobodalla Shire Council's divisional manager strategy and sustainability Vivian Shaw co-authored the draft Batemans Bay Master Plan.

Eurobodalla Shire Council’s divisional manager strategy and sustainability Vivian Shaw co-authored the draft Batemans Bay Master Plan. Photo: Eurobodalla Shire Council.

Two speakers at Eurobodalla Shire Council’s public access meeting criticised council’s draft Batemans Bay Master Plan (BBMP) and the process. Another outlined a potential solution to ease congestion in Moruya that would allay people’s fears about emergency access during holiday times.

Dr Brett Stevenson, co-convenor of A Better Eurobodalla (ABE), has a PhD in coastal processes. He addressed councillors on Tuesday (14 October) about last month’s release of Australia’s National Climate Risk Assessment (NCRA).

It details how climate change will affect Australia’s health, infrastructure, economy and environment. It focuses on 11 priority national climate risks and warns of increasing hazards including extreme storms, heatwaves and sea-level rise, which lead to significant economic costs and impacts on communities and ecosystems.

READ ALSO Global expert says Cuttagee Bridge design options don’t uphold its heritage values

The NCRA identified four priority hazards applicable to Batemans Bay.

These are coastal erosion and shoreline change; coastal and estuarine flooding; riverine and flash flooding; and bushfires.

“Batemans Bay is a low-lying swampy area on an exposed coastal site located at the mouth of the Clyde River, a major riverine system,” Dr Stevenson said.

“It is exposed to hazards of both coastal inundation from oceanic storm surge and sea level rise, as well as riverine flooding, together with coastal erosion and shore change. These impacts can occur simultaneously, increasing the magnitude of the resultant inundation at Batemans Bay.”

Five key Gateway and Landmark sites in the draft Batemans Bay Master Plan.

Five key Gateway and Landmark sites in the draft Batemans Bay Master Plan. Photo: Eurobodalla Shire Council website.

The NCRA said exposure to risks from sea level rise was increased in coastal areas with high population density, residential buildings near soft shorelines, and erosion due to higher sea levels and shoreline characteristics.

Dr Stevenson said this mirrored the BBMP’s proposed multiple high-rise residential buildings containing an additional 8000 dwellings being constructed on a low-lying coastal area already experiencing coastal erosion and retreat.

The NCRA also indicated that present-day extremes and flood events would become increasingly frequent and eventually chronic under potential sea rise in the 21st century.

Dr Stevenson said the current serious coastal erosion at Caseys Beach and Surfside highlighted the problem created when urban development was located on vulnerable sites.

“If implemented, the long-term costs of the draft BBMP would make the cost of coastal protection works at Surfside look minuscule,” he said. “These costs would be borne by Eurobodalla ratepayers and NSW taxpayers.”

Furthermore, insurance would become either unavailable or unaffordable to residents and businesses in such areas.

Dr Stevenson said given the significant risks the NCRA highlighted, ABE considered the draft BBMP’s deficiencies must be addressed now in an integrated manner via best practice strategic planning, including incorporating community engagement from the outset.

He urged council to suspend work on the BBMP until the full implications of the NCRA have been assessed and to have Australian Climate Services staff brief councillors and interested ratepayers on the NCRA via video conference.

“This would assist councillors, council staff, ratepayers and taxpayers to be fully informed of the risks, hazards and cost implications for the BBMP,” Dr Stevenson said.

The proposed Moruya bypass remains unfunded.

The proposed Moruya bypass remains unfunded. Photo: Transport for NSW.

Bingie resident Cid Mateo said council’s draft Housing Strategy presented to the community in 2024 appeared to have been drafted to support the existing draft BBMP that was presented to the community in 2025.

“This has put the planning cart before the housing horse. It should be the other way around,” Mr Mateo said.

Secondly, council had largely ignored 2015 community consultation to inform the housing strategy and improve the twin local issues of housing affordability and lack of diversity in housing options.

Thirdly, council seemingly ignored the November 2023 comprehensive research and analysis by Judith Stubbs and Associates that council had commissioned.

READ ALSO Share your memories as work on second life for gateway bridge to the South Coast continues

To get the Housing Strategy and BBMP back on track, Mr Mateo said the probity report into the BBMP should inform a revised Housing Strategy. That in turn should inform the BBMP and other town plans.

“This follows best practice planning guidance provided by the NSW Government,” he said.

Mr Mateo also suggested a Housing and Planning Steering Committee with representatives from all housing and planning stakeholders in the community to guide next steps.

Earlier Frank Ross suggested that council make representations to Transport for NSW for emergency traffic lights at the corner of Shore St and at the corner of North Head Drive during busy holiday periods to clear the bridge when needed for fire trucks and for ambulances to get patients to Moruya Hospital. Councillors Colleen Turner and Sharon Winslade will follow up.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

8
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

It continues to defeat logic that Council, against so much very-well-qualified, cautious and cautioning opposition from people with vast experience and knowledge, continues to push-the-barrow, especially when cold, hard scientific facts illustrate that the ‘vision’ is at best amateurish. Council almost promulgates it as broadly-supported by residents, with a supposed “70%” support level from those visiting the information venue – 70% of how many? What % of the broad population would give support? It also puts forward that a minority of opponents was from out-of-town… aw,yeah…erm…? Perhaps this whole circus be typical of Council – including employee-officers – exhibiting habitual stance of “We know better than you”? It clearly, frankly smacks of extremely-obvious ‘grand-plan’ dream-ups, likely with the objective of recovering from the financial deep-pit into which Council has delivered us. Does it and do Councillors take notice, absorb and act upon the much-better-qualified information and considered opinions of genuine experts, many of whom are locals? Don’t ever! bet on that. Personal experience of having not even received acknowledgement, let alone considered, courteous response of any kind from my local government councillor may be indicative as to how much we [perhaps don’t] count.

Jennifer Knott10:47 am 20 Oct 25

This development is highly inappropriate for Bateman,s Bay . Not all locals are in the Council,s pocket .It will
Not provide any benefits to the locals re affordable housing .Where is the new emergency department????? X.
Thank you Mr Bloke .

Jennifer Knott10:48 am 20 Oct 25

Well -said .

Thank you Dr Stevenson, Mr Mateo and Mr Ross for attending the public access meeting to raise these important matters with our elected representatives. I am however totally gobsmacked that the matters reported in this article are still open and ongoing for discussion, especially after the overwhelming feedback submitted by the community to Council quite a few months back following the public exhibition period of the master plan; which undoubtedly raised these exact concerns. There has also been years of feedback and community consultation regarding housing solutions across the shire, and the traffic flow issues in and around Moruya…even Google knows it’s not a 20 minute drive from the Bay to the Regional Hospital that the spin doctors want us to believe, that’s what it takes to drive from Percy Davis Drive to the first set of traffic lights in ‘light’ holiday traffic! Everyone living north of the Moruya Bridge has had that experience. So why are our elected Federal, State and local representatives still procrastinating and tiptoeing around this topic when community safety is at risk?

I am quite sure most residents would be expecting council staff and our elected representatives to be presenting the community with a consultation report with amendments to the masterplan and a timeline of deliverable outcomes at this point in time, not still gathering information. The cause and affect of sea level rise and tidal changes in and around the Batemans Bay CBD is real and only a matter of time before destruction occurs; you only need to look at the whole east coast of Australia to understand the impact of coastal erosion, and I’m not an advocate for climate change, just a realist.
If our Council, Mayor and elected representatives choose to ignore the warning signs of coastal erosion and tidal changes already evident across the whole shire, and vote to proceed on a masterplan regardless of the future consequences then it just confirms their focus is more on building their empires and protecting their positions than protecting our communities and our natural environment.

Kruger Dunning7:04 am 17 Oct 25

Excellent work by Council to ensure it is exposed to a wide range of views. Without discussion and good arguments decisions are often captured by the loudest, best financed and most obnoxious parties. People will have to live, work and shop in Batemans Bay well into the future.

Jenny Knowles6:00 pm 16 Oct 25

Well said Robbie. ABE are bullies and very arrogant. We need positive progress in the Bay not more boomer NIMBY inertia.

Honestly Why would anyone believe anything that is presented by a person that states the words Climate Change in the opening reasons about the shire? Just another example of WHY the ESC has gone down the drain taking advise from Professionals that might have all the paper qualifications just it’s a pity they mean nothing in the real world

Good work by Council to keep this important strategy going. ABE and Dr Stevenson? Really? No idea but always negative and obnoxious critics of anyone progress. ABE are basically has been low level ex Canberra bureaucrats and Congo NIMBYs with not a great deal to offer except pompous wittering. ABE – A Broke Eurobodalla.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.