Opinion

Why Government should not be competing with small oyster businesses – Leanne Atkinson

By Leanne Atkinson 6 December 2018
Labor candidate for Bega, Leanne Atkinson on Eden. Photo: Ian Campbell

Labor candidate for Bega, Leanne Atkinson in Eden. Photo: Ian Campbell.

Small businesses should be owned and operated by families and private individuals – not by the government.

This is why the decision of Premier Berejiklian to take a $3.3 million ownership stake in Australia’s Oyster Coast (AOC) in my mind is contentious and controversial.

Small businesses are the lifeblood of the economy, particularly in regional areas like ours. They create jobs, produce goods and services, and support economic development in our communities.

In a competitive, free market, some businesses succeed, and some don’t. The point is that people should be free to manage the risks and rewards that come with owning your own business without the Government threatening their livelihoods.

If a business fails to thrive, this should not be because of competition from a rival business in the same sector that is backed by the Government which has the financial muscle to undercut them.

This is not fair competition at all.

For example, imagine how the owner of a café or hairdresser would feel if the Government had invested in a café or salon that opened across the road? Compared to the local family-owned small business, the Government’s financial resources are unlimited.

In such a circumstance, how could any local small business feel confident, knowing that the financial resources of the Government could be exercised to wipe them out at any time?

The conflict of interest is profound considering it is the Government that sets the rules and regulations for small business. It is the Government that sends in inspectors and conducts audits. It is the Government that determines the tax arrangements for businesses.

How can any business be sure that they are being treated fairly in such circumstances?

Premier Berejiklian has never explained why, of the 700,000 small businesses in NSW, her Government decided to invest taxpayer funds in Australia’s Oyster Coast?

Local oyster producers are entitled to ask, “Why are they picking on us?”

The Berejiklian Government’s decision to play favourites by backing one oyster producer over the many family-owned enterprises along the Far South Coast is unfair, divisive and has the potential to decimate our local industry.

Many people are angry because the Government did not undertake any consultation about investing in AOC and has stopped listening to others in the sector who are seeking answers.

The whole issue has been marked by a lack of transparency.

For example, the Government paid ROC Partners, an investment firm registered in the Cayman Islands, for their advice to buy into Australia’s Oyster Coast. No other oyster grower was invited to bid for the money and, no other oyster grower was aware of this deal until it was done.

Now the Government refuses to disclose how much they paid ROC partners or why Australia’s Oyster Coast was chosen.

Could the reason be that the chair of Australia’s Oyster Coast is a good friend of the Liberal Party?

The public has a right to know how their tax dollars are being spent and the reasoning behind those decisions.

I want to know why the local Member, Andrew Constance, who was there at the time the investment was announced, didn’t see what damage this would cause to oyster businesses in his own electorate?

I believe that the conflict of interest is irreconcilable and can only be ended by the Government ceasing to be a shareholder in AOC.

The money invested in AOC should be made available to benefit the entire South Coast oyster industry – not just one favoured firm with good political connections.

Leanne Atkinson is the Labor candidate for the NSW state seat of Bega.

Region Media has asked Andrew Constance, Member for Bega for a response.

What's Your Opinion?

4 Responses to Why Government should not be competing with small oyster businesses – Leanne Atkinson

Filter
Order
andrew baker 6:36 am 07 Dec 18

bloody beautiful Leanne!

fair, concise and right on the money (so to speak!)

andy

Caroline Henry 9:48 am 07 Dec 18

Great article.

Very well articlated giving an honest assesment of how the majority of our Industry feels.

Thank you for keeping this issue out there so this matter is not swept the carpet and forgotten and hopefully this Government will find a way to assist the rest of the Oyster Industry with similar financial assistance. Our farmers would have been able to create more jobs, increase their own businesses and productivity plus generate a positive influence to all the communities they live and work in if they had been consulted and included.

Maureen 12:47 pm 07 Dec 18

Great letter Leanne! It is important that tax payers money is used transparently. We do have a right to have the questions you have asked of Andrew Constance answered. Yes why did Mr Constance not foresee the damage to local oyster farmers caused by his decision to preference a business friend of the Liberal Party with tax payers money?

Mary Howard GAICD Holder of an advanced certificate in Aquaculture 4:22 pm 08 Dec 18

In the Commercial Fishing sector, the government has taken it upon themselves to bring in a Reform after the Industry had been issued Access shares in 2007 in perpetuity. At this time the government assured the industry they could invest with security. The years later they have shared the catch history for some fisheries and not others. they created a subsidised share market based around the offer of a subsidy of $16 million. In the share trade many businesses were unsuccessful. The actually entered in to phoning fishers at the end of round three and the announcement of the close of the round. Some fishers assisted after the event. What do I think. This government has NO absolutely NO regard for equity, small business or jobs in the fishing industry. I would expect they would treat the Oyster Industry similar. Isn't it the same Deputy Director general managing both.

Top