1 October 2026

Ratepayers seek answers over giant $15 billion Gregadoo data centre

| By Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
4
site map

The Gregadoo data centre site plan. Photo: EJE Architects 2026.

The Wagga Residents and Ratepayers Association is demanding proper consultation and full transparency over a proposed giant $15 billion data centre campus at Gregadoo.

Wagga Wagga City Council announced the proposal, saying Canberra-based CDC Data Centres had lodged plans for a massive campus at 216 Ashfords Road, Gregadoo, next to the tip.

CDC is a major Australian data centre operator, with facilities in Canberra, Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and Auckland. Its data centres house powerful computers and servers that store and process the digital information behind services such as online banking, government systems and other online services.

The proposed Gregadoo campus would cover about 63 hectares – roughly 90 AFL football fields – within a 104-hectare site, with four buildings containing about 189,000 square metres of floor space.

At full capacity, it could require up to 1.4 gigawatts of electricity, making it an industrial-scale power user.

The project is being assessed as a state significant development, meaning the NSW Government is the final decision-maker, not Wagga Council.

The NSW Government planning process is only at the early stage of preparing the requirements for CDC’s environmental assessment. If the project progresses, a detailed environmental impact statement will be prepared and put on public exhibition before the NSW Government assesses the proposal and makes a decision.

“The proposal represents a potentially generational economic, investment and workforce opportunity for Wagga Wagga and the wider region,” Wagga Council said in a statement.

“If approved and delivered, an investment of this scale has the potential to generate significant construction activity over a number of years, support local contractors and suppliers, create skilled ongoing employment and provide opportunities for education, training and workforce development.”

READ ALSO Two petitions launched against giant Gregadoo data centre as residents fight back

Wagga Residents and Ratepayers Association president Chris Roche said the sheer size of the proposal meant the community needed to be given clear information.

“We were made aware of the potential of the data centre by the mayor,” he said.

“We were told it was newer technology and it won’t be as noisy or use as much water as previous models.

“We enquired about the location address of an existing similar data centre in Canberra so we could check, but were told that was confidential, which seems ridiculous.”

The Gregadoo project plans include up to 384 diesel backup generators and about 6400 tonnes of diesel storage. The generators would be used as emergency backup rather than to power the data centre during normal operations.

CDC says its generators would run infrequently and are designed to minimise noise and emissions.

The company says it chose the location because of its access to major electricity infrastructure, high-speed internet and distance from homes. It added that the site is about 1.3 kilometres from the Wagga Wagga Terminal Station and that it would pay for its own electricity connection and any required network augmentation.

CDC also says the project could create hundreds of construction jobs and ongoing skilled jobs, and that it intends to use local workers and suppliers where possible.

The company says it is committed to community consultation as the project progresses.

Further information on the proposal is provided on the NSW Planning Proposal website.

Original Article published by Oliver Jacques on Region Riverina.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

4
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Nanny McNannyState3:51 pm 02 Oct 26

I really wonder what alternate to the current government Maureen Law is after? I guess another turgid and boring essay will provide an answer?

Keep the faith, Wagga Ratepayers Association. Hopefully, we only have another 18 months before we can oust the current government.

Also confidential is the location of a training school which I suspect is hidden in bush land somewhere in Canberra. Applicants for government positions must attend whereby their brain is removed and it is drilled into them that they are smarter than God and must be obeyed. They are thereafter noted as government employees. And their main role is to cause as much frustration to the population as is humanly possible. They would never be able to get a job in the private sector as this sector is “selective” as to whom they employ.

We can observe now that the top graduates of this school can even reach the positions of PM and Federal Treasurer (now he gets A plus on his report card for trying to cover his mismanagement of our money by blaming the war in Iran and expecting us to believe it). The school must be really proud of this graduate.

Lower grade students are placed as heads of government departments or can attain the position of Mayor of a local Council. However, after some time, and listening to the residents, some of these Councils abandon their training and choose to act in a mature and responsible manner. Wagga Council does not seem to be one of these as previous stories re the homeless in parks can attest. They forget the residents are paying their salaries so therefore are entitled to know the exact details of plans. Stating some information re these plans is confidential is not acceptable to the ratepayers. I suggest beginning a petition in your area.

Despite the PM saying before the last Federal election his government would be transparent I doubt many of these graduates would know how to spell the word, let alone understand its meaning.

And, of course, private sector businesses are understandably out to make a profit. In some cases they are not averse to distorting facts or placing a gloss on their projects. Most of the top management and staff do not live in the area where they plan to erect data centres, wind farms and similar so have no concern how the local residents may be affected. And one never knows what incentive these businesses may have given to Councils to progress their plans.

I suggest you and your colleagues do a Google search and you will find the following……………

* Key Problems with Data Centres.

Extreme Energy Use: Data centres run 24 hours a day and draw massive amounts of electricity, especially newer facilities built to train and power artificial intelligence (AI). This high demand can overwhelm local power grids and raise electricity costs for nearby residents. High energy demands often require regional power plants to burn more fossil fuels, indirectly increasing regional smog and respiratory risks

High Water Consumption: Cooling thousands of hot servers requires millions of gallons of water daily, depleting local water supplies—particularly in dry or drought-prone regions.

Air and Noise Pollution: Facilities often rely on diesel-fueled backup generators for emergency power. Regular testing and emergency use release harmful air pollutants and create disruptive and constant industrial noise.

So much for the rubbish another top graduate from the school – Chris Bowen – is sprouting. How will he explain we now need fossil fuel?

Health impacts: Chronic exposure to low-level environmental noise and sleep disruption can lead to elevated stress, headaches, hypertension, and cardiovascular strain

Few Permanent Jobs: While construction creates temporary building jobs, a finished data centre typically employs only a small handful of permanent workers (often around 50 people)

Distrust of Tech and Secretive Deals: Communities often express deep frustration with local officials who sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or offer heavy tax breaks to trillion-dollar tech companies without public input. As noted by international reporting in The Guardian, this backlash has grown from a localised U.S. issue into a widespread global conversation.

It’s been impressive just how well communities have organised around this, how educated they have become about the topic, and how many of these projects they have been able to stop. It’s a sort of David and Goliath fight; local communities are pushing back against some of the wealthiest companies in the world. Certainly not every effort is successful. Sometimes, the wealth and power of these companies win out. But many data centre projects have been blocked by local resistance.

I’m not sure what is happening in 18 months, but you can change the government in charge if this project in less than 6 months at the NSW election.

Just to clarify one point in my last email. There are escapees from the government employee training facility in Canberra. They join emergency services. Some become medical practitioners/nurses etc. A few become intelligent teachers – but these are rare as we are noting the quality of education declining rapidly. These escapees live in the real world and speak to many people of different nationalities, as well as Australians, so they know what is being said on the ground.

I am referring to those who work in windowless rooms and only come in contact with the same people every day. It seems there must be a contest as to who can come up with the most stupid idea. As an example. When one purchases an Express Delivery envelope one notes on the addresses of sender and receiver there is a panel after the street address which says “Traditional name of place (if known)”, after which is the panel for Australian suburb. How many people would know, or more importantly care, what the traditional name is? What low level of intelligence is required to even think of this idea? However, I guess this has been approved by Anika Wells, the Minister for Communications.

Those in the real world have now lost patience with the aboriginal culture being forced on us by blinkered governments. We HATE it. The aboriginals have become their own worst enemy courtesy of the windowless room people.

I advise the Wagga Ratepayers Association to take with a grain of salt the statement by your Council that the final decision re the data centre will be made by the government. By design, government departments on all levels support each other and your Council is trying to absolve themselves in a cowardly way from future criticism by stating this. This has happened with our incompetent Eurobodalla Council when they felt the need to change the name of the Batemans Bay bridge to an unattractive aboriginal word – which benefits no one in the community and a waste of money considering they seem to be in financial difficulties at the moment. After complaints from residents the Council said they were referring it to TfNSW. Only wishing to distance themselves from any criticism.

Some weeks ago I wrote to the Minister for Transport – John Graham – re a serious issue concerning the safety of disabled people in my area. This, after almost 2 years of contact with the ESC and receiving no response as to why this has been allowed to occur. As the problem does not seem to have been addressed I can only assume TfNSW may have been given incorrect information from Council therefore backing this “my way or the highway” group of councillors – a few of whom seem not long out of nappies. Or worse, they also have no concern re the safety of residents.

So believe very little of what you may hear from your Council. There may be hidden agendas.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.