29 March 2026

Preference deal could hand Farrer to One Nation, but will the Libs regret it?

| By Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
2
man at microphone with woman looking

David Farley speaks to a crowd in Albury as Pauline Hanson looks on with admiration. Photo: One Nation.

One Nation has emerged as the trendsetter in the by-election race for Farrer, running a slick and energetic campaign that has drawn a huge crowd to its launch and built a dominant social media presence.

The announcement this week that Pauline Hanson’s party is likely to swap preferences with the Liberals could be the icing on the cake – the factor that delivers them their first federal Lower House win after more than 30 years of trying. It may also prove a strategic misstep for the Coalition by strengthening a party already eating into its base.

Voters ultimately decide how they number candidates under Australia’s preferential electoral system. But parties still wield significant influence through “how to vote” (HTV) cards handed out at polling booths. Many voters – particularly those less engaged in politics – follow these cards closely, meaning preference deals can determine the result.

We’ve already seen the power of this strategy. At the recent South Australian election, the Liberals recommended preferencing One Nation, and the minor party returned the favour.

Now, we can’t even call them a “minor party”. One Nation secured a higher primary vote than the Liberals and may even finish neck-and-neck with them on seats.

READ ALSO Liberals to preference One Nation as Farrer poll shows bump for Milthorpe in gender-divided race

Pauline Hanson told media on Thursday (26 March) she’d be very happy to strike a similar deal in Farrer, and Liberal deputy leader Jane Hume has indicated the party would likely be open to it.

If it proceeds, it would be a major boost for One Nation candidate David Farley in what is shaping as a two-horse race against independent Michelle Milthorpe.

A recent Australia Institute poll has Farley leading on 28 per cent of the primary vote, with Milthorpe on 23 per cent, the Liberals on 19 per cent, and the Nationals, Greens and others a long way back. On those numbers, no candidate comes close to an outright majority, meaning preferences will decide the contest.

Liberal and National voters, guided by HTV cards, would likely direct a significant share of their preferences to Farley. He is also well placed to attract flows from right-leaning minor parties such as Family First.

Milthorpe, by contrast, faces a tougher path. At the 2022 election, she benefited from strong preference flows from Labor and Greens voters. This time, Labor is not running a candidate and the Greens vote appears minimal, depriving her of the preference base that previously kept her competitive.

In short, Farley is holding the stronger hand – and he’s playing it well. He has been articulate, disciplined, and on-message throughout the campaign. Rising petrol prices are also fuelling voter frustration – terrain that traditionally favours One Nation.

To be clear, this is not an endorsement of this party, but an assessment of the factors currently working in its favour.

Critics argue One Nation lacks substance, plays on people’s fears and can be a bit loose with the truth when campaigning, but none of this stopped it winning seats in South Australia.

Farrer betting markets are also shifting rapidly. Odds that once had One Nation as a long shot at around $5.50 have tightened dramatically to near $2, reflecting growing confidence in its chances. A formal preference would shorten those odds even further, creating a steep uphill battle for Milthorpe.

If Farley takes Farrer, it would be a landmark moment for One Nation. After decades on the political fringes, winning a federal Lower House seat would signal a transition from protest movement to parliamentary force. Donors would take notice, and so too would ordinary Aussies who previously dismissed them as a wasted vote.

READ ALSO One Nation wins Farrer comfortably as vote surges in Griffith, Leeton and Narrandera

And that is where the longer-term risk for the Coalition becomes clear. By preferencing One Nation now, the Liberals may be helping to build a more formidable rival – one capable of turning borrowed preferences into permanent support. They could end up facing the same dynamic seen elsewhere: insurgent movements reshaping the parties that once enabled them, whether it be Reform eroding Conservative support in the UK or Donald Trump’s movement transforming the Republican Party in the United States.

In politics, preference deals are often about short-term survival. But in in the electorate based around Griffith and Albury, the Liberals may be doing more than influencing a single result – they may be helping to write the next chapter of One Nation’s rise.

And if that rise culminates in victory, it will be a case of the Coalition discovering that when you feed the preference beast, it doesn’t always stay on a leash.

Original Article published by Oliver Jacques on Region Riverina.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

2
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Philip Creagh11:44 am 30 Mar 26

The South Australian election shows how a preferential system (not the same as the Federal system) can produce many anomalies

ALP received 37% of primary vote (has 34 seats), Liberals 19% (has 5 seats), One Nation 23% (has 3 seats) and Greens and many Independents have 20% (has 4 seats). This can be extrapolated to the weird ACT modified Hare-Clark which means (IMO) that Labor will be in Government forever in the ACT.

Hein mentions ONP as having a negative agenda – which is true. However they are similar to the Greens in their approach as a protest party. The Greens with enough clout (10% of the vote in a state with an upper house) produce severe anomalies for country folks. If they had a rational, pragmatic approach to issues such as natural resource use, taxation and immigration then they would be more ‘voteable’.

Many rural/regional electorates have an astonishingly low Green vote, yet they continue to run candidates in virtually every electorate and, in many cases, provide the boost for the ALP

AS far as I’m aware ONP has not preferenced a party at any election. Nor has the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party for that matter at the 2023 NSW election.

Dr Hein Vandenbergh7:30 am 30 Mar 26

It’s not a wise move to vote for a party which essentially has a negative, ‘we’re against x and y and z’ etc agenda. Democracy arose as a positive movement – let’s keep it that way.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.