13 May 2026

Issues raised about draft Moruya floodplain risk study; Moruya Country Markets wants backdated discounts

| By Marion Williams
Join the conversation
4
In August 2020 Moruya was on floodwatch

In August 2020 Moruya was on floodwatch. Photo: Karyn Starmer.

At a recent Eurobodalla Shire Council public access meeting attention was drawn to the proposed planning controls associated with the draft Moruya Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (MFRMSP) and its implications for future development in the CBD and surrounds.

Kerri Riches, president of the Moruya Country Markets’ management committee, asked councillors why the registered not-for-profit had not received any discounts over the past 18 years or so.

Council’s draft schedule of fees and charges for 2026/27 proposes that Moruya Country Markets receives a 40 per cent discount, in line with the discount that SAGE Farmers Market receives. It is the first time council has proposed applying a discount to the Moruya Country Markets.

Moruya resident Lachlan Bain is an environmental engineer with more than 12 years’ experience in the water management field who spoke about the MFRMSP.

He drew councillors’ attention to the proposed planning controls that require any new development to demonstrate that evacuation is possible at, or close to the ‘probable maximum flood event’ (PMF event).

The modelling in the draft MFRMSP has estimated flood levels in a range of probability events. These include the one per cent AEP (annual exceedance probability) event, about a one in 100-year event, and the PMF event. It is the maximum possible, very big and very rare, likely greater than a 1 in 10,000 year event.

READ ALSO Costly actions detailed in draft Moruya flood management plan

The one per cent AEP event flood level has increased from 5.1 metres to 6.3 metres due to climate change. That means a larger area and more properties would be impacted.

The PMF event level has increased from 7.6 metres to 9.5 metres. The result is a difference of more than three metres between the one per cent AEP event and the PMF event.

Mr Bain said those two levels were important because they drove much of the planning controls around what could and couldn’t be done in the floodplain. It specifies things such as floor levels, building materials and emergency response, with the proposed emergency response controls being the most restrictive.

He said the large difference between the one per cent AEP event and PMF event meant the required evacuation response was not possible and would prevent development in most of the yellow and blue areas (below).

Parts of Moruya depicted by flood constraint category.

Parts of Moruya depicted by flood constraint category. Photo: Supplied.

“This proposed control is highly restrictive, particularly given the Moruya Floodplain is well served by a flood warning system provided by the Bureau of Meteorology that provides flood warning to Moruya for much smaller events than the one per cent AEP and PMF,” he said.

He said there was a significant lag between rainfall in the catchment and the flood wave.

“Unfortunately the MFRMSP does not consider the opportunity cost of such onerous restrictions in their recommendations,” Mr Bain said. “Much of the CBD would no longer be able to be developed, even for commercial development such as a mechanic, or cafe, and existing buildings may not be able to be improved. Existing residential development in the blue areas may not be able to be rebuilt or vacant land built on.”

READ ALSO UPDATED: Despite coastal erosion and rising sea levels, Batemans Bay flood risk much lower than Moruya, councillors told

He was concerned about the social and economic impacts of limiting opportunities to rebuild or improve development within the floodplain. “Leaving large parts of the town effectively in a time capsule, or worse, would lead to significant economic and employment impacts on the town.”

He said council should accept the MFRMSP but explicitly not adopt the proposed land use planning updates, listed as PM04, as they were too restrictive.

“These controls could be developed separately by council with the community as part of preparing the new development control plans for the area, and could be done in conjunction with improvements to the flood warning system,” he said.

He said the recommended planning controls were setting the bars too high. “You need to weigh up the risks of having people on the floodplain. I think there is a more nuanced approach.”

Moruya Country Markets is an outlet for local producers and artisans.

Moruya Country Markets is an outlet for local producers and artisans. Photo: Supplied.

Ms Riches wanted to understand why council had not given Moruya Country Markets discounts in the past given it was a registered not-for-profit that gave all profits back to the local community.

“For the 20 years we have been at Riverside Park, 19 years of rent to council was $1,322,827,” she said. “If we had got the 40 per cent discount we would be $529,000 better off.”

Submissions on the draft fees and charges for 2026/27 close at 4:30 pm on 31 May.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

4
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Mr Steri Flow10:33 am 13 May 26

Stall holders demand discounts? Gimme a freebie and a handout it’s only ratepayer money. The stalls sell things for cash. Do they pay tax? They make lots of money. So pay your way you bludgers. I wonder if certain useless and weak Councillors will cave in?

Rosedale Ozempic10:28 am 13 May 26

I wonder if the local amateur flood expert (drain digger) has any property in the identified flood areas? If so I am sure he will squeal when the water is rising for help from taxpayers and ratepayers. He is the type of genius that would plan another Lithgow. So many genuine self interested know it all’s in our Shire.

Damien Rogers8:48 am 13 May 26

Basically shutting down ongoing development for the whole CBD will obviously destroy the town. What is wrong with these bureaucrats?

Trish Hellier6:16 pm 13 May 26

Watching the last Council meeting when a Development item came up on the Agenda I heard items raised by some councillors being flood studies. lack of housing etc. For years we have seen the ESC spend many $’s on many, many consultants & bureaucrats. The Sea Level Rise Policy that the ESC adopted in 2014 differed to that of Shoalhaven and Bega Council despite the fact that the 3 Councils Shared the same Consultant Whitehead and Associates. My view is that the ESC Sea Level Policy Policy was the worst possible policy. My view is that monies spent on consultants and bureaucrats could have been spent in other areas. Surfside is a prime example all the monies spent on beach nourishment, dredging, consultants could have built a rock wall similar to Casey’s Beach, now we have a CMP that is believed to be outdated. We are seeing the lack of housing and on one hand we have Councillors pushing for housing and on the other hand we have the same Councillors raising “flood studies” . I believe that ESC’s policies have #…ed this shire. Trish Hellier

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.