7 May 2026

Is the ban on pre-meeting briefings for councillors having the desired effect? Not in Eurobodalla.

| By Marion Williams
Join the conversation
4
council chambers

The banning of pre-meeting briefings has shaken up how things are handled at Eurobodalla Shire Council. Photo: Karyn Starmer.

Eurobodalla Shire Council’s recent meeting raised questions about the effectiveness of council meetings for facilitating robust debate and well-informed, considered decision-making, particularly given recent reforms that ban private briefings for councillors.

A contributing factor was the meeting’s 142-page agenda, with attachments totalling 1403 pages.

Additionally, three agenda items were of high public interest including the potential sale and closure of Coopers Island Road. Earlier that day community members lodged a 153-page petition with council with 1500 signatures in support of keeping the road open. Since notifying its proposal to close and sell the road late last year council has received 39 submissions from members of the public, including 37 objections.

Another item was a planning proposal to subdivide land in Mossy Point zoned C4 Environmental Living and C2 Environmental Conservation to make it available for residential development. Council received 59 submissions, including 55 objections, and three residents spoke against the proposal during the public forum. Councillor Amber Schutz moved to defer voting on the matter to get more information on the lot averaging clause that enabled the developer to propose 11 lots that did not meet the minimum lot size.

READ ALSO Ban on private briefings to NSW councillors overturned - what next?

The contentious issue of reinstating vehicular and pedestrian access at Maloneys Beach was also on the agenda. The review of environmental factors that was exhibited over summer received 127 submissions.

The second agenda item for discussion was a question on notice from councillor Anthony Mayne about the role of community submissions in the decision-making process.

He said councillors lived in a new world order where private pre-meeting briefings by council staff had been banned.

Before the council meeting on 28 April, supporters of keeping Coopers Island Road open met to present a petition. Photo: Supplied.

“We are coming into this meeting on significant and complex matters without briefings, asking questions on the fly and then having to debate,” Cr Mayne said. “We have listened to incredible presentations from the community today and we have to incorporate that into the information we have been given. We need those submissions. Your voice is vital.”

That prompted Cr Sharon Winslade to say – that since they no longer received briefings – “I feel like I’m not part of this anymore”.

“I put a question in writing and get an answer back in writing the following day. We have to be briefed deeply.”

Mayor Mat Hatcher said the changes to the NSW Local Government Code of Meeting Practice that came into effect this year “aren’t ideal”.

“Previously we would have weeks of briefings. It gives you very little time to seek advice,” Mayor Hatcher said. “If you don’t feel you have enough information that is what deferrals are for.”

Councillor Mick Johnson had similar thoughts. “The people who come to us for our judgment aren’t getting value because we are up late at night trying to understand and still receiving information an hour before the meeting.”

The crammed agenda saw five items deferred until next month’s meeting, including Maloney’s Beach access.

Terry Hill and Max Castle lodging a 1500-signature petition with council regarding Coopers Island Road. Photo: Supplied.

It also led to many people registering to speak in the public forum. Instead of the usual seven minutes to address councillors, they were only given four minutes. The final speakers were then told they had two minutes.

That prompted an outburst from one speaker, Max Castle. “The system can’t continue to work like this. This will be the biggest media story to come out of the South Coast this year,” he said. “I will be making a submission to council, and I expect it to be in the minutes. Our First Nations people haven’t been consulted and they were very upset.”

Another speaker wrote to council to lodge a formal complaint about the way the public forum was conducted. “It represents a clear failure of procedural fairness, transparency, and the principal of natural justice that underpins meaningful community participation.”

READ ALSO 'Serious questions' raised over NSW Government's proposed ban on private briefings for local councils

Jim Bright, whose career was in the federal public service giving advice on integrity and governance, said the ban on pre-meeting briefings must change.

He said there was almost always not enough time, especially for the public, to go through the meeting’s papers between Wednesday afternoon when they were published on council’s website and Tuesday’s council meeting. That, combined with the lack of pre-meeting briefings, meant councillors did not have time to think things through and seek clarification.

Bernie O’Neil, co-convenor of A Better Eurobodalla, said it was unworkable for councillors and the public to get across the “punishingly large” agenda in so few days. “It would be helpful if pre-meeting briefings were held and made public and if the agenda came out a week earlier.”

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

4
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Maxwell Not-Smart2:05 pm 10 May 26

Maybe the nincompoop Councillors need to realise they are actually there to make decisions. Instead they just dither, backflip and pander to every squeaky NIMBY and unelected fringe nutter in the Shire. Stop beating up the expert staff and make a proper decision. First up the budget……why are our water and sewerage rates so high? Prioritise roads and infrastructure before any more vanity projects like the Pav. Live within your means you dimwitted clowns.

Jeff de Jager7:34 am 03 May 26

Council could schedule another monthly meeting, open to the public, say a fortnight ahead, where matters could be discussed without final decisions being made at the next”official” meeting. something similar was in place years ago. Smart people at council could no doubt think of a title which would satisfy the code.

Rosedale Ogre12:08 pm 02 May 26

Moan and whine. The State Government changes were identified years ago. Councillor Winslade, the self proclaimed expert in everything, thinks she is not part of it anymore? Then please resign and hand back your ratepayer money.

patricia gardiner9:44 am 02 May 26

The problem is exacerbated by the fact that councillors voted to reduce the frequency of meetings from fortnightly to 10 per year back in 2023. !0 meetings a year is the bare minimum under the Local Government Act.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.