28 April 2026

Australia's anti-adoption response to the Stolen Generation is harming vulnerable children

| By Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
3
mum with son

Many children in our foster care system will never have a forever home. Photo: Pexels.

The number of children adopted from foster care in Australia continues to plummet, down to just 64 in 2024–25, according to data released this month.

That is an extraordinarily low figure when considering the roughly 45,000 children living in government care, thousands of whom are now being placed in institutions, and in some cases even living in motels due to the chronic shortage of foster carers.

In other words, children in out-of-home care are much more likely to end up in soulless accommodation with paid staff than to be adopted into a permanent, loving family home.

This sums up the modern tragedy of Australia’s oxymoronic “child protection” system.

READ ALSO ‘No choice’: Griffith mother’s story of 1960s-era adoption in Australia

In our necessary reckoning with the Stolen Generation and the era of forced adoptions, we have overcorrected in a way that has swapped one harm with another: the trauma of forced removal has been replaced by prolonged instability.

In doing so, we are inflicting immense harm on another generation of our most vulnerable children. And in an echo of the past, one thing has not changed: adults make the decisions, while we continue to ignore the voices of the kids whose lives are affected.

The problem with foster care

Children are placed in out-of-home care after being removed from their birth families due to serious abuse or neglect. It is meant to be temporary, with reunification the goal.

But in reality, reunification often never occurs, or takes years when it does. We should be doing far more to support birth parents – but we cannot ask children to put their future on hold while an underfunded system tries, and often fails, to get there.

Given the tens of thousands of children who remain in our overloaded care system for several years, we are more reliant on crisis responses than long-term solutions.

In NSW, a two-year-old baby was kept in a hotel for five months due to a lack of available foster placements. In another disturbing case, children were placed in the same household as a convicted serial killer.

It’s true that there are many dedicated foster carers doing their best within a broken system. But temporary care does not provide children with what they most need: permanence and a sense of belonging.

Foster carers are not the legal parents – the government is. And children in care know that at any point in time, a bureaucrat could knock on their door with an order to return them to a birth parent, move them into kinship care, or shuffle them to another placement entirely.

For kids who have already experienced abuse, neglect and removal, that feeling of living on eggshells can shape their entire life trajectory.

The outcomes for children leaving care are devastating. Around one-third of young people exiting out-of-home care become homeless within the first year. Fewer than three per cent go on to university. Clearly, this system isn’t providing the stability needed to build a foundation for adult life.

Resistance to adoption despite its benefits

Adoption permanently transfers full parental rights to adoptive carers, giving children something most people take for granted: a forever family and the legal certainty that they belong somewhere.

Research consistently shows that adopted children tend to have better long-term outcomes than those who remain in foster care, largely because of the stability and security it provides.

Many foster carers want to adopt children in their care if they have no prospect of going back to their birth families. But they are often not given the chance. Adoption is rarely raised proactively by caseworkers, and when it is, carers frequently describe long delays, repeated reassessments and processes that can take several years to finalise.

READ ALSO NSW Government ignoring children’s views and not giving them permanency, says foster care review

Adoption numbers in Australia have declined sharply since the 1970s. This is not accidental, but a response to the country’s shameful history of forced adoptions, where Indigenous and unmarried mothers were often coerced into giving up their children and were never able to see them again. That legacy rightly demanded reform, apology and caution.

Many caseworkers remain hostile to adoption, and state and territory governments are hesitant to make it easier, for fear of being accused of creating another Stolen Generation.

When caution becomes harm

But what we now have is not balance. It is a drastic overcorrection. Adoption has become so rare and so difficult that even when a child asks for it, their voice is too often ignored, drowned out by adults driven by fear, guilt and politics.

It doesn’t have to be that way. Adoption as practised today is vastly different from how it was done in the past. Children are taught about their history and connected with their birth families whenever it is safe to do so. There are examples of successful open adoptions that can serve as templates for others to follow.

Adoption isn’t a viable option for many children in foster care. But in a system where tens of thousands of children are growing up without a permanent home, it should be helping far more than just 64 each year.

Unless we are willing to make adoption easier, we risk condemning another generation of vulnerable children to the same cycle of instability the system was meant to prevent.

Original Article published by Oliver Jacques on Region Canberra.

Free, trusted local news delivered direct to your inbox.

Keep up-to-date with what's happening around the Capital region by signing up for our free daily newsletter.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

3
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Jackie French2:17 pm 03 May 26

I’m furious. NSW Bushfire incompetence killed people, destroyed homes and 2,000 HA. Inaccuracies, poor decisions, poor training- and most volunteers have now left because of it. Their site is still inaccurate and their ‘Hazards Near Me’ often fails. How dare official negligence be re written this way! We face another bad season with the same incompetence and most things promised still undone.

Peter Capomolla Moore1:31 pm 30 Apr 26

Oliver you presented a very old flawed argument. Used by the Pro-Adoption Industry for their own benifits not the childs.
Using elements of a flawed fostercare system to support old ideas which procalim to solve a problem of displaced children.
Same flawed argument were used for Stolen Generation & Adoption (Forced or not)
Another non-Adoptee telling Adoptees what was / is good for them.
My trauma was not that I was so called “Forced Adopted” That was my mothers trauma.
My grandmother’s trauma was stolen generation.
My trauma is that I was adopted.
How is it in the best interests of the child to erase their Original “REAL” Birth Certificate?
How is it in the best interests of the child to erase their identity for life.
How is it in the best interests of the child to fabricate a “FAKE” Birth Certificate that delusionally states I was born to adoptive parents.
Is a foundation of lies & deceipt (the legal construct of the Archaic Adoption Act) really a good foundation to build a realtionship with a child.
No and don’t come back to me with that crap of a so called silver bullet to fix adoption i.e. so called open adoption or the integrated birth certificate.
I was in openness of adoption from the early 1990’s, no one bothered to tell me.
I was beholden to the or was it the government, my adopters, their family and friends who were beholden to that lie.
Replacing a “FAKE” Birth Certificate with another “Fake” Document (integrated birth certificate) does not cut the mustard. Adding insult to injury.
I have over 17 years experience as a fostercarer, 68 years as an Adoptee.
Yes fostercare often doesn’t give the stability and results desired. Some have very serious mental health issues.
And you think you can solve these by erasing their identity?
It is a very complicated subject.
All children seperated from families have seperation trauma, many have complex trauma.
Oliver are you adopted? Are you informed about the lifelong effects of identity loss.
Oliver how many kids have you fostered?
What’s your lived or living experience?
No not that argument “I know someone who is adopted and their fine”
From the outside I would have been a poster child for adoption, nothing could be further from the truth.
I had reasonably good care.
Loving me to the moon and back would never give me back my family.
I was trafficked into servitude of adoption.
I was an unwilling actor in someone elses pantomine.
The government (Adoption Act) was the scripwriter and my adopters were the producers.
I wake up ever morning with identity loss I can never get back, no matter what my family reunions look liked.

If they had a Royal Commission on Adoption & Fostercare I would have a lot to say what is wrong with Fostercare and how it could be managed better, how children could get more stability, how we could give some more tools to carers, but I can’t fix it completely nor can adoption.
Adoption adds anaother layer of trauma which can and should be avoided.

Potatopoint Freeway5:32 pm 02 May 26

So what do you suggest Peter? A big victimhood spiel but not a single positive suggestion. Open your eyes to what is happening in the Alice.

Daily Digest

Do you like to know what’s happening around your region? Every day the About Regional team packages up our most popular stories and sends them straight to your inbox for free. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.